TY - JOUR
T1 - The influence of wall roughness on bubble drag reduction in Taylor-Couette turbulence
AU - Verschoof, Ruben A.
AU - Bakhuis, Dennis
AU - Bullee, Pim A.
AU - Huisman, Sander G.
AU - Sun, Chao
AU - Lohse, Detlef
N1 - Cambridge UP deal
PY - 2018/7/20
Y1 - 2018/7/20
N2 - We experimentally study the influence of wall roughness on bubble drag reduction in turbulent Taylor-Couette flow, i.e. the flow between two concentric, independently rotating cylinders. We measure the drag in the system for the cases with and without air, and add roughness by installing transverse ribs on either one or both of the cylinders. For the smooth-wall case (no ribs) and the case of ribs on the inner cylinder only, we observe strong drag reduction up to DR and DR, respectively, for a void fraction of. However, with ribs mounted on both cylinders or on the outer cylinder only, the drag reduction is weak, less than DR, and thus quite close to the trivial effect of reduced effective density. Flow visualizations show that stable turbulent Taylor vortices-large-scale vortical structures-are induced in these two cases, i.e. the cases with ribs on the outer cylinder. These strong secondary flows move the bubbles away from the boundary layer, making the bubbles less effective than what had previously been observed for the smooth-wall case. Measurements with counter-rotating smooth cylinders, a regime in which pronounced Taylor rolls are also induced, confirm that it is really the Taylor vortices that weaken the bubble drag reduction mechanism. Our findings show that, although bubble drag reduction can indeed be effective for smooth walls, its effect can be spoiled by e.g. biofouling and omnipresent wall roughness, as the roughness can induce strong secondary flows.
AB - We experimentally study the influence of wall roughness on bubble drag reduction in turbulent Taylor-Couette flow, i.e. the flow between two concentric, independently rotating cylinders. We measure the drag in the system for the cases with and without air, and add roughness by installing transverse ribs on either one or both of the cylinders. For the smooth-wall case (no ribs) and the case of ribs on the inner cylinder only, we observe strong drag reduction up to DR and DR, respectively, for a void fraction of. However, with ribs mounted on both cylinders or on the outer cylinder only, the drag reduction is weak, less than DR, and thus quite close to the trivial effect of reduced effective density. Flow visualizations show that stable turbulent Taylor vortices-large-scale vortical structures-are induced in these two cases, i.e. the cases with ribs on the outer cylinder. These strong secondary flows move the bubbles away from the boundary layer, making the bubbles less effective than what had previously been observed for the smooth-wall case. Measurements with counter-rotating smooth cylinders, a regime in which pronounced Taylor rolls are also induced, confirm that it is really the Taylor vortices that weaken the bubble drag reduction mechanism. Our findings show that, although bubble drag reduction can indeed be effective for smooth walls, its effect can be spoiled by e.g. biofouling and omnipresent wall roughness, as the roughness can induce strong secondary flows.
KW - UT-Hybrid-D
KW - Multiphase flow
KW - Taylor-Couette flow
KW - Drag reduction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050593782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/jfm.2018.515
DO - 10.1017/jfm.2018.515
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85050593782
SN - 0022-1120
VL - 851
SP - 436
EP - 446
JO - Journal of fluid mechanics
JF - Journal of fluid mechanics
ER -