Abstract
Although the theoretical literature has shown that the Panzar–Rosse H-statistic fails as a measure of market power, it is still a widely used statistic in empirical banking studies. Such studies still rely on the erroneous belief that H > 0 is inconsistent with significant market power. This chapter provides empirical evidence against the latter belief by analyzing a US banking duopoly. We find “competitive” estimates of H but, consistent with a priori expectations, non-competitive outcomes according to an alternate measure of competition, the Lerner index. Moreover, our bank-specific estimates of H are mutually inconsistent, suggesting additional problems with the Panzar–Rosse test.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Handbook of Competition in Banking and Finance |
| Editors | Jacob A. Bikker, Laura Spierdijk |
| Publisher | Edward Elgar |
| Pages | 27-45 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781785363306 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781785363290 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Panzar-Rosse Revenue Test and Market Power in Banking: An Empirical Illustration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver