The Pareto set as decision support information in multimodal passenger transportation network design

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademic

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Given a range of traffic related sustainability problems, policy makers need to know which measures should be taken to reach their objectives as much as possible. Multi-objective optimisation is useful to support these decisions, because it results in an overview of possibly optimal solutions. This Pareto set can be very large, especially if more than two (mainly opposed) objectives are involved. This is also the case when optimising infrastructure planning in a multimodal passenger transportation network, with accessibility, use of urban space by parking, operating deficit and climate impact as objectives. Methods are presented to derive problem knowledge from the Pareto set. This includes the best values per objective, average trade-off values between pairs of objectives and identification of the min-max solution. These methods make the Pareto set more useful as decision support information: they demonstrate the next step in multi-objective option prioritisation. An insight provided for a case study in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area in The Netherlands is that it is possible to improve all aspects of sustainability simultaneously in comparison to the current transportation network: the current design is not part of the Pareto set. Next, improving travel time further can be done cost-efficiently, but reducing CO2 emissions is expensive when using measures related to multimodal trip making. Finally, increasing frequencies appears to be more effective to improve sustainability than introducing P&R facilities and train stations.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings CASPT Conference, 19-23 July 2015, Rotterdam
Place of PublicationRotterdam
PublisherCASPT
Pages1-20
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jul 2015
EventConference on Advanced Systems in Public Transport, CASPT 2015 - Rotterdam, Netherlands
Duration: 19 Jul 201523 Jul 2015

Conference

ConferenceConference on Advanced Systems in Public Transport, CASPT 2015
Abbreviated titleCASPT
CountryNetherlands
CityRotterdam
Period19/07/1523/07/15

Fingerprint

Sustainable development
Parking
Travel time
Multiobjective optimization
Planning
Costs

Keywords

  • Decision support
  • Genetic algorithm
  • Multi-criteria analysis
  • Multimodal passenger transportation networks
  • Multi-objective optimisation

Cite this

Brands, T., Wismans, L. J. J., & van Berkum, E. C. (2015). The Pareto set as decision support information in multimodal passenger transportation network design. In Proceedings CASPT Conference, 19-23 July 2015, Rotterdam (pp. 1-20). Rotterdam: CASPT.
Brands, Ties ; Wismans, Luc J.J. ; van Berkum, Eric C. / The Pareto set as decision support information in multimodal passenger transportation network design. Proceedings CASPT Conference, 19-23 July 2015, Rotterdam. Rotterdam : CASPT, 2015. pp. 1-20
@inproceedings{c701b514496a4aa4bb571bef7e04e42f,
title = "The Pareto set as decision support information in multimodal passenger transportation network design",
abstract = "Given a range of traffic related sustainability problems, policy makers need to know which measures should be taken to reach their objectives as much as possible. Multi-objective optimisation is useful to support these decisions, because it results in an overview of possibly optimal solutions. This Pareto set can be very large, especially if more than two (mainly opposed) objectives are involved. This is also the case when optimising infrastructure planning in a multimodal passenger transportation network, with accessibility, use of urban space by parking, operating deficit and climate impact as objectives. Methods are presented to derive problem knowledge from the Pareto set. This includes the best values per objective, average trade-off values between pairs of objectives and identification of the min-max solution. These methods make the Pareto set more useful as decision support information: they demonstrate the next step in multi-objective option prioritisation. An insight provided for a case study in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area in The Netherlands is that it is possible to improve all aspects of sustainability simultaneously in comparison to the current transportation network: the current design is not part of the Pareto set. Next, improving travel time further can be done cost-efficiently, but reducing CO2 emissions is expensive when using measures related to multimodal trip making. Finally, increasing frequencies appears to be more effective to improve sustainability than introducing P&R facilities and train stations.",
keywords = "Decision support, Genetic algorithm, Multi-criteria analysis, Multimodal passenger transportation networks, Multi-objective optimisation",
author = "Ties Brands and Wismans, {Luc J.J.} and {van Berkum}, {Eric C.}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "19",
language = "English",
pages = "1--20",
booktitle = "Proceedings CASPT Conference, 19-23 July 2015, Rotterdam",
publisher = "CASPT",

}

Brands, T, Wismans, LJJ & van Berkum, EC 2015, The Pareto set as decision support information in multimodal passenger transportation network design. in Proceedings CASPT Conference, 19-23 July 2015, Rotterdam. CASPT, Rotterdam, pp. 1-20, Conference on Advanced Systems in Public Transport, CASPT 2015, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 19/07/15.

The Pareto set as decision support information in multimodal passenger transportation network design. / Brands, Ties; Wismans, Luc J.J.; van Berkum, Eric C.

Proceedings CASPT Conference, 19-23 July 2015, Rotterdam. Rotterdam : CASPT, 2015. p. 1-20.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademic

TY - GEN

T1 - The Pareto set as decision support information in multimodal passenger transportation network design

AU - Brands, Ties

AU - Wismans, Luc J.J.

AU - van Berkum, Eric C.

PY - 2015/7/19

Y1 - 2015/7/19

N2 - Given a range of traffic related sustainability problems, policy makers need to know which measures should be taken to reach their objectives as much as possible. Multi-objective optimisation is useful to support these decisions, because it results in an overview of possibly optimal solutions. This Pareto set can be very large, especially if more than two (mainly opposed) objectives are involved. This is also the case when optimising infrastructure planning in a multimodal passenger transportation network, with accessibility, use of urban space by parking, operating deficit and climate impact as objectives. Methods are presented to derive problem knowledge from the Pareto set. This includes the best values per objective, average trade-off values between pairs of objectives and identification of the min-max solution. These methods make the Pareto set more useful as decision support information: they demonstrate the next step in multi-objective option prioritisation. An insight provided for a case study in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area in The Netherlands is that it is possible to improve all aspects of sustainability simultaneously in comparison to the current transportation network: the current design is not part of the Pareto set. Next, improving travel time further can be done cost-efficiently, but reducing CO2 emissions is expensive when using measures related to multimodal trip making. Finally, increasing frequencies appears to be more effective to improve sustainability than introducing P&R facilities and train stations.

AB - Given a range of traffic related sustainability problems, policy makers need to know which measures should be taken to reach their objectives as much as possible. Multi-objective optimisation is useful to support these decisions, because it results in an overview of possibly optimal solutions. This Pareto set can be very large, especially if more than two (mainly opposed) objectives are involved. This is also the case when optimising infrastructure planning in a multimodal passenger transportation network, with accessibility, use of urban space by parking, operating deficit and climate impact as objectives. Methods are presented to derive problem knowledge from the Pareto set. This includes the best values per objective, average trade-off values between pairs of objectives and identification of the min-max solution. These methods make the Pareto set more useful as decision support information: they demonstrate the next step in multi-objective option prioritisation. An insight provided for a case study in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area in The Netherlands is that it is possible to improve all aspects of sustainability simultaneously in comparison to the current transportation network: the current design is not part of the Pareto set. Next, improving travel time further can be done cost-efficiently, but reducing CO2 emissions is expensive when using measures related to multimodal trip making. Finally, increasing frequencies appears to be more effective to improve sustainability than introducing P&R facilities and train stations.

KW - Decision support

KW - Genetic algorithm

KW - Multi-criteria analysis

KW - Multimodal passenger transportation networks

KW - Multi-objective optimisation

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 1

EP - 20

BT - Proceedings CASPT Conference, 19-23 July 2015, Rotterdam

PB - CASPT

CY - Rotterdam

ER -

Brands T, Wismans LJJ, van Berkum EC. The Pareto set as decision support information in multimodal passenger transportation network design. In Proceedings CASPT Conference, 19-23 July 2015, Rotterdam. Rotterdam: CASPT. 2015. p. 1-20