The Posthuman as Hollow Idol: A Nietzschean Critique of Human Enhancement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
338 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper, the author aims to show that transhumanists are confused about their own conception of the posthuman: transhumanists anticipate radical transformation of the human through technology and at the same time assume that the criteria to determine what is “normal” and what is “enhanced” are univocal, both in our present time and in the future. Inspired by Nietzsche’s notion of the Overhuman, the author argues that the slightest “historical and phenomenological sense” discloses copious variations of criteria, both diachronic and synchronic, for what can be considered “normal” and “enhanced.” Radical transformation through technology does not simply enable us to become “stronger,” “smarter,” or “healthier,” but it can and often will also change the very standard or yardstick with which we measure what counts as “stronger,” “smarter,” or “healthier.” Put yet differently: new and emerging technologies are not neutral means but often bring about different and, from our current perspective, foreign standards for determining what are “normal” and “enhanced” capacities. Since the qualitative meanings of these terms are themselves not fixed, it is unintelligible and too reassuring to simply predict that new technologies will enhance human beings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)304-327
JournalJournal of medicine and philosophy
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Apr 2017

Keywords

  • human enhancement
  • Nietzsche
  • Overhuman
  • posthuman
  • transhumanism

Cite this

@article{d7889ee9cc714931ad5f37d3b232075f,
title = "The Posthuman as Hollow Idol: A Nietzschean Critique of Human Enhancement",
abstract = "In this paper, the author aims to show that transhumanists are confused about their own conception of the posthuman: transhumanists anticipate radical transformation of the human through technology and at the same time assume that the criteria to determine what is “normal” and what is “enhanced” are univocal, both in our present time and in the future. Inspired by Nietzsche’s notion of the Overhuman, the author argues that the slightest “historical and phenomenological sense” discloses copious variations of criteria, both diachronic and synchronic, for what can be considered “normal” and “enhanced.” Radical transformation through technology does not simply enable us to become “stronger,” “smarter,” or “healthier,” but it can and often will also change the very standard or yardstick with which we measure what counts as “stronger,” “smarter,” or “healthier.” Put yet differently: new and emerging technologies are not neutral means but often bring about different and, from our current perspective, foreign standards for determining what are “normal” and “enhanced” capacities. Since the qualitative meanings of these terms are themselves not fixed, it is unintelligible and too reassuring to simply predict that new technologies will enhance human beings.",
keywords = "human enhancement, Nietzsche, Overhuman, posthuman, transhumanism",
author = "Ciano Aydin",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1093/jmp/jhx002",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "304--327",
journal = "Journal of medicine and philosophy",
issn = "0360-5310",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

The Posthuman as Hollow Idol : A Nietzschean Critique of Human Enhancement. / Aydin, Ciano .

In: Journal of medicine and philosophy, Vol. 42, No. 3, 17.04.2017, p. 304-327.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Posthuman as Hollow Idol

T2 - A Nietzschean Critique of Human Enhancement

AU - Aydin, Ciano

PY - 2017/4/17

Y1 - 2017/4/17

N2 - In this paper, the author aims to show that transhumanists are confused about their own conception of the posthuman: transhumanists anticipate radical transformation of the human through technology and at the same time assume that the criteria to determine what is “normal” and what is “enhanced” are univocal, both in our present time and in the future. Inspired by Nietzsche’s notion of the Overhuman, the author argues that the slightest “historical and phenomenological sense” discloses copious variations of criteria, both diachronic and synchronic, for what can be considered “normal” and “enhanced.” Radical transformation through technology does not simply enable us to become “stronger,” “smarter,” or “healthier,” but it can and often will also change the very standard or yardstick with which we measure what counts as “stronger,” “smarter,” or “healthier.” Put yet differently: new and emerging technologies are not neutral means but often bring about different and, from our current perspective, foreign standards for determining what are “normal” and “enhanced” capacities. Since the qualitative meanings of these terms are themselves not fixed, it is unintelligible and too reassuring to simply predict that new technologies will enhance human beings.

AB - In this paper, the author aims to show that transhumanists are confused about their own conception of the posthuman: transhumanists anticipate radical transformation of the human through technology and at the same time assume that the criteria to determine what is “normal” and what is “enhanced” are univocal, both in our present time and in the future. Inspired by Nietzsche’s notion of the Overhuman, the author argues that the slightest “historical and phenomenological sense” discloses copious variations of criteria, both diachronic and synchronic, for what can be considered “normal” and “enhanced.” Radical transformation through technology does not simply enable us to become “stronger,” “smarter,” or “healthier,” but it can and often will also change the very standard or yardstick with which we measure what counts as “stronger,” “smarter,” or “healthier.” Put yet differently: new and emerging technologies are not neutral means but often bring about different and, from our current perspective, foreign standards for determining what are “normal” and “enhanced” capacities. Since the qualitative meanings of these terms are themselves not fixed, it is unintelligible and too reassuring to simply predict that new technologies will enhance human beings.

KW - human enhancement

KW - Nietzsche

KW - Overhuman

KW - posthuman

KW - transhumanism

U2 - 10.1093/jmp/jhx002

DO - 10.1093/jmp/jhx002

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 304

EP - 327

JO - Journal of medicine and philosophy

JF - Journal of medicine and philosophy

SN - 0360-5310

IS - 3

ER -