The potential for shared decision-making and decision aids in rehabilitation medicine

Janine Astrid van Til, Constance H.C. Drossaert, Renate Annemiek Punter, R. Annemiek Punter, Maarten Joost IJzerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
80 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: Shared decision-making and the use of decision aids are increasingly promoted in various healthcare settings. The extent of their current use and potential in rehabilitation medicine is unknown. The aim of the present study was to explore the barriers to and facilitators of shared decision-making and use of decision aids in daily practice, and to explore the perceptions of physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) physicians toward them. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 408 PRM physicians was performed (response rate 31%). Results: PRM physicians expressed the highest levels of comfort with shared decision-making as opposed to paternalistic and informed decision-making. The majority reported that shared decision-making constituted their usual approach. The most important barriers to shared decision-making were cases in which the patient received conflicting recommendations and when the patient had difficulty accepting the disease. Key facilitators were the patient’s trust in the PRM physician and the patient being knowledgeable about the disease and about treatment options. PRM physicians’ attitudes towards the use of decision aids to inform patients were moderately positive. Conclusion: Shared decision-making appears to have great potential in the rehabilitation setting. Increasing the use of decision aids may contribute to the further implementation of shared decision-making.
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)598-604
JournalJournal of rehabilitation medicine
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • Decision Making
  • (Human)
  • IR-76569
  • psychological models
  • physician-patient relations
  • personal autonomy
  • patient satisfaction
  • patient participation
  • METIS-267291

Cite this