The psychology of electoral mobilization: a subtle priming experiment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper we test the idea that citizens can be stimulated to vote in an election via subtle psychological processes, which have little or nothing to do with the act of voting as such. More specifically, we argue that presenting voters with stimuli that induce an active mood will increase their tendency to vote. We conducted an experiment to test our ideas. Participants were subtly primed by giving them a campaign leaflet that contained a word puzzle, which included words that are associated with either action or inaction. The results indicate that subtly primed participants in the action condition reported stronger voting intentions than those in the inaction condition. These findings suggest that individuals can indeed be stimulated (or inhibited) to vote through subtle psychological processes. We discuss the implications of our results for the study of voting behaviour as well as campaigns aimed at electoral mobilization.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-311
JournalJournal of elections, public opinion and parties
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

mobilization
voter
psychology
voting
experiment
campaign
leaflet
voting behavior
mood
stimulus
election
citizen

Keywords

  • METIS-316644
  • IR-100387

Cite this

@article{5ceaa4441202468d932aab0fd5cdb929,
title = "The psychology of electoral mobilization: a subtle priming experiment",
abstract = "In this paper we test the idea that citizens can be stimulated to vote in an election via subtle psychological processes, which have little or nothing to do with the act of voting as such. More specifically, we argue that presenting voters with stimuli that induce an active mood will increase their tendency to vote. We conducted an experiment to test our ideas. Participants were subtly primed by giving them a campaign leaflet that contained a word puzzle, which included words that are associated with either action or inaction. The results indicate that subtly primed participants in the action condition reported stronger voting intentions than those in the inaction condition. These findings suggest that individuals can indeed be stimulated (or inhibited) to vote through subtle psychological processes. We discuss the implications of our results for the study of voting behaviour as well as campaigns aimed at electoral mobilization.",
keywords = "METIS-316644, IR-100387",
author = "Martin Nyhuis and Gosselt, {Jordi Franciscus} and Martin Rosema",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1080/17457289.2016.1160909",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "293--311",
journal = "Journal of elections, public opinion and parties",
issn = "1745-7289",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

The psychology of electoral mobilization: a subtle priming experiment. / Nyhuis, Martin; Gosselt, Jordi Franciscus; Rosema, Martin.

In: Journal of elections, public opinion and parties, Vol. 26, No. 3, 22.04.2016, p. 293-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The psychology of electoral mobilization: a subtle priming experiment

AU - Nyhuis, Martin

AU - Gosselt, Jordi Franciscus

AU - Rosema, Martin

PY - 2016/4/22

Y1 - 2016/4/22

N2 - In this paper we test the idea that citizens can be stimulated to vote in an election via subtle psychological processes, which have little or nothing to do with the act of voting as such. More specifically, we argue that presenting voters with stimuli that induce an active mood will increase their tendency to vote. We conducted an experiment to test our ideas. Participants were subtly primed by giving them a campaign leaflet that contained a word puzzle, which included words that are associated with either action or inaction. The results indicate that subtly primed participants in the action condition reported stronger voting intentions than those in the inaction condition. These findings suggest that individuals can indeed be stimulated (or inhibited) to vote through subtle psychological processes. We discuss the implications of our results for the study of voting behaviour as well as campaigns aimed at electoral mobilization.

AB - In this paper we test the idea that citizens can be stimulated to vote in an election via subtle psychological processes, which have little or nothing to do with the act of voting as such. More specifically, we argue that presenting voters with stimuli that induce an active mood will increase their tendency to vote. We conducted an experiment to test our ideas. Participants were subtly primed by giving them a campaign leaflet that contained a word puzzle, which included words that are associated with either action or inaction. The results indicate that subtly primed participants in the action condition reported stronger voting intentions than those in the inaction condition. These findings suggest that individuals can indeed be stimulated (or inhibited) to vote through subtle psychological processes. We discuss the implications of our results for the study of voting behaviour as well as campaigns aimed at electoral mobilization.

KW - METIS-316644

KW - IR-100387

U2 - 10.1080/17457289.2016.1160909

DO - 10.1080/17457289.2016.1160909

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 293

EP - 311

JO - Journal of elections, public opinion and parties

JF - Journal of elections, public opinion and parties

SN - 1745-7289

IS - 3

ER -