Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to show that for frequently procuring public clients: the reasoning behind the use of procurement instruments is a process in its own right that requires managerial and scientific attention; modeling this process contributes to making sensible procurement choices; and managing this process is a relevant factor in the client’s development toward strategic procurement. Design/methodology/approach: A model is developed to conceptualize the reasoning behind procurement instruments. Using this model in a case study, the reasoning behind the evolution of a particular procurement instrument as applied by a public infrastructure management organization is reconstructed. Findings: The case study results show that an initially explicitly formulated set of main reasons for operating a qualification system can implicitly evolve over time into a different set of reasons. From a managerial point of view, explication of implicit reasons is important to both avoid the risk that the real value of the procurement instrument remains undetected as well as properly assess its strategic alignment with higher level strategies. The conceptual model proves to be a useful tool to support that. Originality/value: Bringing the reasoning behind the use of procurement instruments to the fore, this study explores an area of construction procurement research that is positioned between the disciplines of purchasing and supply management, knowledge management and strategic management.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 303-320 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 18 Mar 2019 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Case study
- Knowledge management
- Strategic management
Cite this
}
The reasoning behind infrastructure manager’s choice of procurement instruments. / Plantinga, Henrico; Voordijk, Hans; Doree, Andre.
In: Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 26, No. 2, 18.03.2019, p. 303-320.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - The reasoning behind infrastructure manager’s choice of procurement instruments
AU - Plantinga, Henrico
AU - Voordijk, Hans
AU - Doree, Andre
PY - 2019/3/18
Y1 - 2019/3/18
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to show that for frequently procuring public clients: the reasoning behind the use of procurement instruments is a process in its own right that requires managerial and scientific attention; modeling this process contributes to making sensible procurement choices; and managing this process is a relevant factor in the client’s development toward strategic procurement. Design/methodology/approach: A model is developed to conceptualize the reasoning behind procurement instruments. Using this model in a case study, the reasoning behind the evolution of a particular procurement instrument as applied by a public infrastructure management organization is reconstructed. Findings: The case study results show that an initially explicitly formulated set of main reasons for operating a qualification system can implicitly evolve over time into a different set of reasons. From a managerial point of view, explication of implicit reasons is important to both avoid the risk that the real value of the procurement instrument remains undetected as well as properly assess its strategic alignment with higher level strategies. The conceptual model proves to be a useful tool to support that. Originality/value: Bringing the reasoning behind the use of procurement instruments to the fore, this study explores an area of construction procurement research that is positioned between the disciplines of purchasing and supply management, knowledge management and strategic management.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to show that for frequently procuring public clients: the reasoning behind the use of procurement instruments is a process in its own right that requires managerial and scientific attention; modeling this process contributes to making sensible procurement choices; and managing this process is a relevant factor in the client’s development toward strategic procurement. Design/methodology/approach: A model is developed to conceptualize the reasoning behind procurement instruments. Using this model in a case study, the reasoning behind the evolution of a particular procurement instrument as applied by a public infrastructure management organization is reconstructed. Findings: The case study results show that an initially explicitly formulated set of main reasons for operating a qualification system can implicitly evolve over time into a different set of reasons. From a managerial point of view, explication of implicit reasons is important to both avoid the risk that the real value of the procurement instrument remains undetected as well as properly assess its strategic alignment with higher level strategies. The conceptual model proves to be a useful tool to support that. Originality/value: Bringing the reasoning behind the use of procurement instruments to the fore, this study explores an area of construction procurement research that is positioned between the disciplines of purchasing and supply management, knowledge management and strategic management.
KW - Case study
KW - Knowledge management
KW - Strategic management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062296664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/ECAM-02-2018-0068
DO - 10.1108/ECAM-02-2018-0068
M3 - Article
VL - 26
SP - 303
EP - 320
JO - Engineering construction and architectural management
JF - Engineering construction and architectural management
SN - 0969-9988
IS - 2
ER -