The reasoning behind infrastructure manager’s choice of procurement instruments

Henrico Plantinga, Hans Voordijk, Andre Doree

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to show that for frequently procuring public clients: the reasoning behind the use of procurement instruments is a process in its own right that requires managerial and scientific attention; modeling this process contributes to making sensible procurement choices; and managing this process is a relevant factor in the client’s development toward strategic procurement. Design/methodology/approach: A model is developed to conceptualize the reasoning behind procurement instruments. Using this model in a case study, the reasoning behind the evolution of a particular procurement instrument as applied by a public infrastructure management organization is reconstructed. Findings: The case study results show that an initially explicitly formulated set of main reasons for operating a qualification system can implicitly evolve over time into a different set of reasons. From a managerial point of view, explication of implicit reasons is important to both avoid the risk that the real value of the procurement instrument remains undetected as well as properly assess its strategic alignment with higher level strategies. The conceptual model proves to be a useful tool to support that. Originality/value: Bringing the reasoning behind the use of procurement instruments to the fore, this study explores an area of construction procurement research that is positioned between the disciplines of purchasing and supply management, knowledge management and strategic management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-320
Number of pages18
JournalEngineering, Construction and Architectural Management
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Managers
Purchasing
Knowledge management
Procurement

Keywords

  • Case study
  • Knowledge management
  • Strategic management

Cite this

@article{f9a51341fd5046d3bfc9076a978bbf76,
title = "The reasoning behind infrastructure manager’s choice of procurement instruments",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to show that for frequently procuring public clients: the reasoning behind the use of procurement instruments is a process in its own right that requires managerial and scientific attention; modeling this process contributes to making sensible procurement choices; and managing this process is a relevant factor in the client’s development toward strategic procurement. Design/methodology/approach: A model is developed to conceptualize the reasoning behind procurement instruments. Using this model in a case study, the reasoning behind the evolution of a particular procurement instrument as applied by a public infrastructure management organization is reconstructed. Findings: The case study results show that an initially explicitly formulated set of main reasons for operating a qualification system can implicitly evolve over time into a different set of reasons. From a managerial point of view, explication of implicit reasons is important to both avoid the risk that the real value of the procurement instrument remains undetected as well as properly assess its strategic alignment with higher level strategies. The conceptual model proves to be a useful tool to support that. Originality/value: Bringing the reasoning behind the use of procurement instruments to the fore, this study explores an area of construction procurement research that is positioned between the disciplines of purchasing and supply management, knowledge management and strategic management.",
keywords = "Case study, Knowledge management, Strategic management",
author = "Henrico Plantinga and Hans Voordijk and Andre Doree",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1108/ECAM-02-2018-0068",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "303--320",
journal = "Engineering construction and architectural management",
issn = "0969-9988",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

The reasoning behind infrastructure manager’s choice of procurement instruments. / Plantinga, Henrico; Voordijk, Hans; Doree, Andre.

In: Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 26, No. 2, 18.03.2019, p. 303-320.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The reasoning behind infrastructure manager’s choice of procurement instruments

AU - Plantinga, Henrico

AU - Voordijk, Hans

AU - Doree, Andre

PY - 2019/3/18

Y1 - 2019/3/18

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to show that for frequently procuring public clients: the reasoning behind the use of procurement instruments is a process in its own right that requires managerial and scientific attention; modeling this process contributes to making sensible procurement choices; and managing this process is a relevant factor in the client’s development toward strategic procurement. Design/methodology/approach: A model is developed to conceptualize the reasoning behind procurement instruments. Using this model in a case study, the reasoning behind the evolution of a particular procurement instrument as applied by a public infrastructure management organization is reconstructed. Findings: The case study results show that an initially explicitly formulated set of main reasons for operating a qualification system can implicitly evolve over time into a different set of reasons. From a managerial point of view, explication of implicit reasons is important to both avoid the risk that the real value of the procurement instrument remains undetected as well as properly assess its strategic alignment with higher level strategies. The conceptual model proves to be a useful tool to support that. Originality/value: Bringing the reasoning behind the use of procurement instruments to the fore, this study explores an area of construction procurement research that is positioned between the disciplines of purchasing and supply management, knowledge management and strategic management.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to show that for frequently procuring public clients: the reasoning behind the use of procurement instruments is a process in its own right that requires managerial and scientific attention; modeling this process contributes to making sensible procurement choices; and managing this process is a relevant factor in the client’s development toward strategic procurement. Design/methodology/approach: A model is developed to conceptualize the reasoning behind procurement instruments. Using this model in a case study, the reasoning behind the evolution of a particular procurement instrument as applied by a public infrastructure management organization is reconstructed. Findings: The case study results show that an initially explicitly formulated set of main reasons for operating a qualification system can implicitly evolve over time into a different set of reasons. From a managerial point of view, explication of implicit reasons is important to both avoid the risk that the real value of the procurement instrument remains undetected as well as properly assess its strategic alignment with higher level strategies. The conceptual model proves to be a useful tool to support that. Originality/value: Bringing the reasoning behind the use of procurement instruments to the fore, this study explores an area of construction procurement research that is positioned between the disciplines of purchasing and supply management, knowledge management and strategic management.

KW - Case study

KW - Knowledge management

KW - Strategic management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062296664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/ECAM-02-2018-0068

DO - 10.1108/ECAM-02-2018-0068

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 303

EP - 320

JO - Engineering construction and architectural management

JF - Engineering construction and architectural management

SN - 0969-9988

IS - 2

ER -