TY - JOUR
T1 - The relationship between drinking motives and interpretation bias in problematic drinkers with mild to borderline intellectual disability
AU - van Duijvenbode, Neomi
AU - Didden, Robert
AU - VanDerNagel, Joanne E.L.
AU - Korzilius, Hubert P.L.M.
AU - Engels, Rutger C.M.E.
N1 - Taylor & Francis deal
PY - 2018/4/3
Y1 - 2018/4/3
N2 - Background The goal of this study was to examine the relationship between drinking motives and interpretation bias (interpreting ambiguous stimuli in an alcohol-related way) in problematic drinkers with and without mild to borderline intellectual disability (MBID). Method Participants (N = 178) were divided into 4 groups based on severity of alcohol use–related problems and full-scale IQ. They completed a word-association task and the Drinking Motives Questionnaire Revised (DMQ-R). Results Problematic drinkers showed an interpretation bias towards alcohol. Participants with MBID had a relatively strong interpretation bias. The DMQ-R coping motive predicted the strength of the bias in negative scenarios, whereas the DMQ-R coping and social motives predicted the strength of the bias in positive scenarios. Conclusions The activation of this bias might depend on individual differences in drinking motives, which provides implications for the assessment and treatment of problematic alcohol use in individuals with and without MBID.
AB - Background The goal of this study was to examine the relationship between drinking motives and interpretation bias (interpreting ambiguous stimuli in an alcohol-related way) in problematic drinkers with and without mild to borderline intellectual disability (MBID). Method Participants (N = 178) were divided into 4 groups based on severity of alcohol use–related problems and full-scale IQ. They completed a word-association task and the Drinking Motives Questionnaire Revised (DMQ-R). Results Problematic drinkers showed an interpretation bias towards alcohol. Participants with MBID had a relatively strong interpretation bias. The DMQ-R coping motive predicted the strength of the bias in negative scenarios, whereas the DMQ-R coping and social motives predicted the strength of the bias in positive scenarios. Conclusions The activation of this bias might depend on individual differences in drinking motives, which provides implications for the assessment and treatment of problematic alcohol use in individuals with and without MBID.
KW - UT-Hybrid-D
KW - alcohol
KW - drinking motives
KW - interpretation bias
KW - mild intellectual disability
KW - addiction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006164457&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/13668250.2016.1268253
DO - 10.3109/13668250.2016.1268253
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85006164457
SN - 1366-8250
VL - 43
SP - 125
EP - 136
JO - Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability
JF - Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability
IS - 2
ER -