The Republic of Science in the 1990s

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

65 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Research councils began as channels for state patronage of science (a widespread phenomenon after World War II) and were captured by the scientists: peer review of proposals, panels, board membership. In this way, they became an important organ of the lsquoRepublic of Sciencersquo (Michael Polanyi's concept). Being awarded a grant is now as important for the reputation or status of a scientist as the money value per se: research councils have become part of the reward system of science. Credibility-cycle analysis (Latour and Woolgar) is used to show this; and then applied to the research council itself, between the State and the national scientific community. Current concerns about proposal success rates and conservatism are analysed in terms of dynamics of this research world. This sociological approach to research councils allows analysis of changes in the reward system of science (where lsquorelevancersquo is becoming an accepted criterion world-wide) and of the complex environment of research councils, where many actors now compete for the intermediary role. Research councils must also become entrepreneurial-or become obsolete.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-23
Number of pages24
JournalHigher education
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1994

Keywords

  • METIS-148996
  • IR-34304
  • Success Rate
  • Research Council
  • Scientific Community
  • Complex Environment
  • Reward System

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Republic of Science in the 1990s'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this