The responsibility to prevent, the duty to educate

Zohar Lederman; Alexandra Cernat; Eleonora Gregori Ferri; Franco Galbo; Guiomar Micol Andrea Levi-Setti; Mayli Mertens; Bryanna Moore; Olga Riklikiene; Jamie Vescio; Sheena Eagan Chamberlin

doi:10.1007/s11017-016-9366-8

The responsibility to prevent, the duty to educate

Zohar Lederman^*, Alexandra Cernat, Eleonora Gregori Ferri, Franco Galbo, Guiomar Micol Andrea Levi-Setti, Mayli Mertens, Bryanna Moore, Olga Riklikiene, Jamie Vescio, Sheena Eagan Chamberlin

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Academic › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We are participants and instructors of Yale University’s 2015 Sherwin B. Nuland Summer Institute in Bioethics. We took part in a seminar that critically examined the problem of dual loyalty and medical ethics in times of conflict, war, and genocide. While health care professionals (HCPs) commit themselves to the health and wellbeing of their individual patients, they may occasionally be called upon to serve the governing authority in ways that conflict with this commitment. Specifically, military HCPs may encounter situations in which ethical tensions arise between the obligations owed to individual patients and those owed to their commanders and the military mission. This seemingly conflicting set of obligations held by the military HCP is commonly referred to as ‘the problem of dual loyalty’ or ‘mixed-agency’ [1, 2].

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	233-236
Number of pages	4
Journal	Theoretical medicine and bioethics
Volume	37
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9366-8
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2016

Keywords

Conflict
Dual loyalty
Medical education
n/a OA procedure

Access to Document

10.1007/s11017-016-9366-8

Cite this

@article{e52af1dd80014c099321545eadb5e834,

title = "The responsibility to prevent, the duty to educate",

abstract = "We are participants and instructors of Yale University{\textquoteright}s 2015 Sherwin B. Nuland Summer Institute in Bioethics. We took part in a seminar that critically examined the problem of dual loyalty and medical ethics in times of conflict, war, and genocide. While health care professionals (HCPs) commit themselves to the health and wellbeing of their individual patients, they may occasionally be called upon to serve the governing authority in ways that conflict with this commitment. Specifically, military HCPs may encounter situations in which ethical tensions arise between the obligations owed to individual patients and those owed to their commanders and the military mission. This seemingly conflicting set of obligations held by the military HCP is commonly referred to as {\textquoteleft}the problem of dual loyalty{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteleft}mixed-agency{\textquoteright} [1, 2].",

keywords = "Conflict, Dual loyalty, Medical education, n/a OA procedure",

author = "Zohar Lederman and Alexandra Cernat and Ferri, {Eleonora Gregori} and Franco Galbo and Levi-Setti, {Guiomar Micol Andrea} and Mayli Mertens and Bryanna Moore and Olga Riklikiene and Jamie Vescio and Chamberlin, {Sheena Eagan}",

year = "2016",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s11017-016-9366-8",

language = "English",

volume = "37",

pages = "233--236",

journal = "Theoretical medicine and bioethics",

issn = "1386-7415",

publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media B.V.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The responsibility to prevent, the duty to educate

AU - Lederman, Zohar

AU - Cernat, Alexandra

AU - Ferri, Eleonora Gregori

AU - Galbo, Franco

AU - Levi-Setti, Guiomar Micol Andrea

AU - Mertens, Mayli

AU - Moore, Bryanna

AU - Riklikiene, Olga

AU - Vescio, Jamie

AU - Chamberlin, Sheena Eagan

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - We are participants and instructors of Yale University’s 2015 Sherwin B. Nuland Summer Institute in Bioethics. We took part in a seminar that critically examined the problem of dual loyalty and medical ethics in times of conflict, war, and genocide. While health care professionals (HCPs) commit themselves to the health and wellbeing of their individual patients, they may occasionally be called upon to serve the governing authority in ways that conflict with this commitment. Specifically, military HCPs may encounter situations in which ethical tensions arise between the obligations owed to individual patients and those owed to their commanders and the military mission. This seemingly conflicting set of obligations held by the military HCP is commonly referred to as ‘the problem of dual loyalty’ or ‘mixed-agency’ [1, 2].

AB - We are participants and instructors of Yale University’s 2015 Sherwin B. Nuland Summer Institute in Bioethics. We took part in a seminar that critically examined the problem of dual loyalty and medical ethics in times of conflict, war, and genocide. While health care professionals (HCPs) commit themselves to the health and wellbeing of their individual patients, they may occasionally be called upon to serve the governing authority in ways that conflict with this commitment. Specifically, military HCPs may encounter situations in which ethical tensions arise between the obligations owed to individual patients and those owed to their commanders and the military mission. This seemingly conflicting set of obligations held by the military HCP is commonly referred to as ‘the problem of dual loyalty’ or ‘mixed-agency’ [1, 2].

KW - Conflict

KW - Dual loyalty

KW - Medical education

KW - n/a OA procedure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975788824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11017-016-9366-8

DO - 10.1007/s11017-016-9366-8

M3 - Letter

C2 - 27289377

SN - 1386-7415

VL - 37

SP - 233

EP - 236

JO - Theoretical medicine and bioethics

JF - Theoretical medicine and bioethics

IS - 3

ER -

The responsibility to prevent, the duty to educate

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this