The role of universities in innovation networks: The role of proximity on innovation dynamics in knowledge community precincts

Milana Korotka, Paul Stephen Benneworth, Tiago Ratinho

Research output: Working paperProfessional

68 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper critically analyses the recent fad for using technopoles and as key economic growth drivers stimulating innovation dynamics in particular territories. Conceptualising technopoles as “knowledge community precincts” creating science-park style benefits, we characterise these benefits as creating proximity between participants. Studying a typical science city, Kennispark in Eastern Netherlands, we discover that geographical proximity is much less important than social, cognitive or institutional proximity to Kennispark academics. The paper argues that local dimension to technopoles requires further analysis, and policy should focus on embedding local firms more actively in technopoles’ knowledge communities.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherCenter for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS)
Number of pages31
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Publication series

NameCHEPS working paper
PublisherCHEPS
No.01
Volume2017

Fingerprint

innovation
university
science
community
economic growth
Netherlands
driver
firm

Keywords

  • IR-104029

Cite this

Korotka, M., Benneworth, P. S., & Ratinho, T. (2017). The role of universities in innovation networks: The role of proximity on innovation dynamics in knowledge community precincts. (CHEPS working paper; Vol. 2017, No. 01). Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS).
Korotka, Milana ; Benneworth, Paul Stephen ; Ratinho, Tiago. / The role of universities in innovation networks: The role of proximity on innovation dynamics in knowledge community precincts. Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS), 2017. (CHEPS working paper; 01).
@techreport{d1a7f440f0d247f7a2c5487e6f8c914d,
title = "The role of universities in innovation networks: The role of proximity on innovation dynamics in knowledge community precincts",
abstract = "This paper critically analyses the recent fad for using technopoles and as key economic growth drivers stimulating innovation dynamics in particular territories. Conceptualising technopoles as “knowledge community precincts” creating science-park style benefits, we characterise these benefits as creating proximity between participants. Studying a typical science city, Kennispark in Eastern Netherlands, we discover that geographical proximity is much less important than social, cognitive or institutional proximity to Kennispark academics. The paper argues that local dimension to technopoles requires further analysis, and policy should focus on embedding local firms more actively in technopoles’ knowledge communities.",
keywords = "IR-104029",
author = "Milana Korotka and Benneworth, {Paul Stephen} and Tiago Ratinho",
note = "CHEPS working paper 2017/01",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
series = "CHEPS working paper",
publisher = "Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS)",
number = "01",
address = "Netherlands",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS)",

}

Korotka, M, Benneworth, PS & Ratinho, T 2017 'The role of universities in innovation networks: The role of proximity on innovation dynamics in knowledge community precincts' CHEPS working paper, no. 01, vol. 2017, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS).

The role of universities in innovation networks: The role of proximity on innovation dynamics in knowledge community precincts. / Korotka, Milana; Benneworth, Paul Stephen; Ratinho, Tiago.

Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS), 2017. (CHEPS working paper; Vol. 2017, No. 01).

Research output: Working paperProfessional

TY - UNPB

T1 - The role of universities in innovation networks: The role of proximity on innovation dynamics in knowledge community precincts

AU - Korotka, Milana

AU - Benneworth, Paul Stephen

AU - Ratinho, Tiago

N1 - CHEPS working paper 2017/01

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This paper critically analyses the recent fad for using technopoles and as key economic growth drivers stimulating innovation dynamics in particular territories. Conceptualising technopoles as “knowledge community precincts” creating science-park style benefits, we characterise these benefits as creating proximity between participants. Studying a typical science city, Kennispark in Eastern Netherlands, we discover that geographical proximity is much less important than social, cognitive or institutional proximity to Kennispark academics. The paper argues that local dimension to technopoles requires further analysis, and policy should focus on embedding local firms more actively in technopoles’ knowledge communities.

AB - This paper critically analyses the recent fad for using technopoles and as key economic growth drivers stimulating innovation dynamics in particular territories. Conceptualising technopoles as “knowledge community precincts” creating science-park style benefits, we characterise these benefits as creating proximity between participants. Studying a typical science city, Kennispark in Eastern Netherlands, we discover that geographical proximity is much less important than social, cognitive or institutional proximity to Kennispark academics. The paper argues that local dimension to technopoles requires further analysis, and policy should focus on embedding local firms more actively in technopoles’ knowledge communities.

KW - IR-104029

M3 - Working paper

T3 - CHEPS working paper

BT - The role of universities in innovation networks: The role of proximity on innovation dynamics in knowledge community precincts

PB - Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS)

ER -

Korotka M, Benneworth PS, Ratinho T. The role of universities in innovation networks: The role of proximity on innovation dynamics in knowledge community precincts. Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS). 2017. (CHEPS working paper; 01).