The science-media interaction in biomedical research in the Netherlands. Opinions of scientists and journalists on the science-media relationship

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
54 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Scientists’ participation in science communication and public engagement activities is considered important and a duty. However, in particular, the science-media relationship has not been studied frequently. In this paper, we present findings from interviews with both scientists and journalists which were guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior. Results show that different behavioural, normative and control beliefs underlie scientists’ and journalists’ participation in science-media interactions. Both groups are positive about science-media interactions, but scientists perceive various disadvantages in this relationship while journalists perceive mainly practical barriers. Enhancing mutual understanding and further research is suggested.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberA03
Pages (from-to)1-21
JournalJournal of science communication (JCOM)
Volume14
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

communication sciences
journalist
Netherlands
Communication
interaction
participation
interview
Group

Keywords

  • IR-98598
  • METIS-313733

Cite this

@article{847c9c7e3e7943b9965f57f0523abeea,
title = "The science-media interaction in biomedical research in the Netherlands. Opinions of scientists and journalists on the science-media relationship",
abstract = "Scientists’ participation in science communication and public engagement activities is considered important and a duty. However, in particular, the science-media relationship has not been studied frequently. In this paper, we present findings from interviews with both scientists and journalists which were guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior. Results show that different behavioural, normative and control beliefs underlie scientists’ and journalists’ participation in science-media interactions. Both groups are positive about science-media interactions, but scientists perceive various disadvantages in this relationship while journalists perceive mainly practical barriers. Enhancing mutual understanding and further research is suggested.",
keywords = "IR-98598, METIS-313733",
author = "Dijkstra, {Anne M.} and Roefs, {Maaike M.} and Drossaert, {Constance H.C.}",
note = "Open access",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Journal of science communication (JCOM)",
issn = "1824-2049",
publisher = "Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (SISSA)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The science-media interaction in biomedical research in the Netherlands. Opinions of scientists and journalists on the science-media relationship

AU - Dijkstra, Anne M.

AU - Roefs, Maaike M.

AU - Drossaert, Constance H.C.

N1 - Open access

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Scientists’ participation in science communication and public engagement activities is considered important and a duty. However, in particular, the science-media relationship has not been studied frequently. In this paper, we present findings from interviews with both scientists and journalists which were guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior. Results show that different behavioural, normative and control beliefs underlie scientists’ and journalists’ participation in science-media interactions. Both groups are positive about science-media interactions, but scientists perceive various disadvantages in this relationship while journalists perceive mainly practical barriers. Enhancing mutual understanding and further research is suggested.

AB - Scientists’ participation in science communication and public engagement activities is considered important and a duty. However, in particular, the science-media relationship has not been studied frequently. In this paper, we present findings from interviews with both scientists and journalists which were guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior. Results show that different behavioural, normative and control beliefs underlie scientists’ and journalists’ participation in science-media interactions. Both groups are positive about science-media interactions, but scientists perceive various disadvantages in this relationship while journalists perceive mainly practical barriers. Enhancing mutual understanding and further research is suggested.

KW - IR-98598

KW - METIS-313733

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Journal of science communication (JCOM)

JF - Journal of science communication (JCOM)

SN - 1824-2049

IS - 2

M1 - A03

ER -