The self-concept of Ukrainian doctoral students: Means-ends decoupling at the state level

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Employing the Twenty Statements Test and a framework of self-motives (self-esteem, self-efficacy, authenticity), this paper examines the self-concept of Ukrainian doctoral students while means-ends decoupling takes place at the state level. The latter implies that the practices of state policies are disconnected from the state's core goal of creating public welfare. Data are taken from a survey of 125 doctoral students at one Ukrainian university and supplemented with 30 personal interviews within the sample of respondents. The findings reveal that in the Ukrainian case, means-ends decoupling at the state level causes institutional complexity, which results in means-ends decoupling at the organisational level, which in turn leads to cultural complexity. Institutional and cultural complexities experienced by doctoral students trigger them to sustain means-ends decoupling at the individual level. The main decoupling for most Ukrainian PhD students is that doctoral education neither increases their employability nor contributes to the development of science, economy or society. Means-ends decoupling at all levels results not only in a severe diversion of financial and human capital but also has a negative impact on individuals' well-being, hindering their personal and professional development and evoking a sense of meaning-lessness, alienation and cognitive dissonance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-197
Number of pages16
JournalHigher education quarterly
Volume73
Issue number2
Early online date5 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

Fingerprint

self-concept
student
cognitive dissonance
development of science
employability
alienation
authenticity
human capital
self-esteem
self-efficacy
finance
well-being
welfare
economy
cause
university
interview
education

Keywords

  • Higher Education
  • Student outcomes
  • Student-motivation
  • Doctoral programmes
  • Ukrainian universities

Cite this

@article{f5ae1c47c7da45bf972e4b6bb7c5062b,
title = "The self-concept of Ukrainian doctoral students: Means-ends decoupling at the state level",
abstract = "Employing the Twenty Statements Test and a framework of self-motives (self-esteem, self-efficacy, authenticity), this paper examines the self-concept of Ukrainian doctoral students while means-ends decoupling takes place at the state level. The latter implies that the practices of state policies are disconnected from the state's core goal of creating public welfare. Data are taken from a survey of 125 doctoral students at one Ukrainian university and supplemented with 30 personal interviews within the sample of respondents. The findings reveal that in the Ukrainian case, means-ends decoupling at the state level causes institutional complexity, which results in means-ends decoupling at the organisational level, which in turn leads to cultural complexity. Institutional and cultural complexities experienced by doctoral students trigger them to sustain means-ends decoupling at the individual level. The main decoupling for most Ukrainian PhD students is that doctoral education neither increases their employability nor contributes to the development of science, economy or society. Means-ends decoupling at all levels results not only in a severe diversion of financial and human capital but also has a negative impact on individuals' well-being, hindering their personal and professional development and evoking a sense of meaning-lessness, alienation and cognitive dissonance.",
keywords = "Higher Education, Student outcomes, Student-motivation, Doctoral programmes, Ukrainian universities",
author = "Myroslava Hladchenko and Westerheijden, {Don F.}",
note = "Wiley Deal",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/hequ.12182",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "182--197",
journal = "Higher education quarterly",
issn = "0951-5224",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

The self-concept of Ukrainian doctoral students : Means-ends decoupling at the state level. / Hladchenko, Myroslava ; Westerheijden, Don F.

In: Higher education quarterly, Vol. 73, No. 2, 04.2019, p. 182-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The self-concept of Ukrainian doctoral students

T2 - Means-ends decoupling at the state level

AU - Hladchenko, Myroslava

AU - Westerheijden, Don F.

N1 - Wiley Deal

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - Employing the Twenty Statements Test and a framework of self-motives (self-esteem, self-efficacy, authenticity), this paper examines the self-concept of Ukrainian doctoral students while means-ends decoupling takes place at the state level. The latter implies that the practices of state policies are disconnected from the state's core goal of creating public welfare. Data are taken from a survey of 125 doctoral students at one Ukrainian university and supplemented with 30 personal interviews within the sample of respondents. The findings reveal that in the Ukrainian case, means-ends decoupling at the state level causes institutional complexity, which results in means-ends decoupling at the organisational level, which in turn leads to cultural complexity. Institutional and cultural complexities experienced by doctoral students trigger them to sustain means-ends decoupling at the individual level. The main decoupling for most Ukrainian PhD students is that doctoral education neither increases their employability nor contributes to the development of science, economy or society. Means-ends decoupling at all levels results not only in a severe diversion of financial and human capital but also has a negative impact on individuals' well-being, hindering their personal and professional development and evoking a sense of meaning-lessness, alienation and cognitive dissonance.

AB - Employing the Twenty Statements Test and a framework of self-motives (self-esteem, self-efficacy, authenticity), this paper examines the self-concept of Ukrainian doctoral students while means-ends decoupling takes place at the state level. The latter implies that the practices of state policies are disconnected from the state's core goal of creating public welfare. Data are taken from a survey of 125 doctoral students at one Ukrainian university and supplemented with 30 personal interviews within the sample of respondents. The findings reveal that in the Ukrainian case, means-ends decoupling at the state level causes institutional complexity, which results in means-ends decoupling at the organisational level, which in turn leads to cultural complexity. Institutional and cultural complexities experienced by doctoral students trigger them to sustain means-ends decoupling at the individual level. The main decoupling for most Ukrainian PhD students is that doctoral education neither increases their employability nor contributes to the development of science, economy or society. Means-ends decoupling at all levels results not only in a severe diversion of financial and human capital but also has a negative impact on individuals' well-being, hindering their personal and professional development and evoking a sense of meaning-lessness, alienation and cognitive dissonance.

KW - Higher Education

KW - Student outcomes

KW - Student-motivation

KW - Doctoral programmes

KW - Ukrainian universities

U2 - 10.1111/hequ.12182

DO - 10.1111/hequ.12182

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 182

EP - 197

JO - Higher education quarterly

JF - Higher education quarterly

SN - 0951-5224

IS - 2

ER -