The third level digital divide: who benefits most from being online?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

266 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose Research into the explanations of digital inclusion has moved from investigations of skills and usage to tangible outcomes, what we label here as the third-level digital divide. There is a lack of theoretical development about which types of people are most likely to benefit. Understanding how achieving outcomes of internet use is linked to other types of (dis)advantage is one of the most complex aspects of digital inclusion research because very few reliable and valid measures have been developed. In the current study we took a first step toward creating an operational framework for measuring tangible outcomes of internet use and linking these to the inequalities identified by digital divide research. Methodology/approach After having proposed a classification for internet outcomes, we assessed these outcomes in a representative sample of the Dutch population. Findings Our overall conclusion in relation to the more general relationship between offline resources and third-level digital divides is that the internet remains more beneficial for those with higher social status, not in terms of how extensively they use the technology but in what they achieve as a result of this use for several important domains. Social implications When information and services are offered online, the number of potential outcomes the internet has to offer increases. If individuals with higher social status are taking greater offline advantage from digital engagement than their lower status counterparts, existing offline inequalities could potentially be acerbated
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCommunication and Information Technologies Annual
EditorsLaura Robinson, Shelia R. Cotten, Jeremy Schulz
PublisherEmerald
Pages29-52
ISBN (Print)978-1-78441-454-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Publication series

NameStudies in Media and Communications
PublisherEmerald
Volume9
ISSN (Print)2050-2060

Fingerprint

digital divide
Internet
social status
inclusion
lack
methodology
resources

Keywords

  • IR-97634
  • METIS-312142

Cite this

van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third level digital divide: who benefits most from being online? In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, & J. Schulz (Eds.), Communication and Information Technologies Annual (pp. 29-52). (Studies in Media and Communications; Vol. 9). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002
van Deursen, Alexander Johannes Aloysius Maria ; Helsper, Ellen J. / The third level digital divide: who benefits most from being online?. Communication and Information Technologies Annual. editor / Laura Robinson ; Shelia R. Cotten ; Jeremy Schulz. Emerald, 2015. pp. 29-52 (Studies in Media and Communications).
@inbook{a7d80d30b69c43348267c524ef61536d,
title = "The third level digital divide: who benefits most from being online?",
abstract = "Purpose Research into the explanations of digital inclusion has moved from investigations of skills and usage to tangible outcomes, what we label here as the third-level digital divide. There is a lack of theoretical development about which types of people are most likely to benefit. Understanding how achieving outcomes of internet use is linked to other types of (dis)advantage is one of the most complex aspects of digital inclusion research because very few reliable and valid measures have been developed. In the current study we took a first step toward creating an operational framework for measuring tangible outcomes of internet use and linking these to the inequalities identified by digital divide research. Methodology/approach After having proposed a classification for internet outcomes, we assessed these outcomes in a representative sample of the Dutch population. Findings Our overall conclusion in relation to the more general relationship between offline resources and third-level digital divides is that the internet remains more beneficial for those with higher social status, not in terms of how extensively they use the technology but in what they achieve as a result of this use for several important domains. Social implications When information and services are offered online, the number of potential outcomes the internet has to offer increases. If individuals with higher social status are taking greater offline advantage from digital engagement than their lower status counterparts, existing offline inequalities could potentially be acerbated",
keywords = "IR-97634, METIS-312142",
author = "{van Deursen}, {Alexander Johannes Aloysius Maria} and Helsper, {Ellen J.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-78441-454-2",
series = "Studies in Media and Communications",
publisher = "Emerald",
pages = "29--52",
editor = "Laura Robinson and Cotten, {Shelia R.} and Jeremy Schulz",
booktitle = "Communication and Information Technologies Annual",

}

van Deursen, AJAM & Helsper, EJ 2015, The third level digital divide: who benefits most from being online? in L Robinson, SR Cotten & J Schulz (eds), Communication and Information Technologies Annual. Studies in Media and Communications, vol. 9, Emerald, pp. 29-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002

The third level digital divide: who benefits most from being online? / van Deursen, Alexander Johannes Aloysius Maria; Helsper, Ellen J.

Communication and Information Technologies Annual. ed. / Laura Robinson; Shelia R. Cotten; Jeremy Schulz. Emerald, 2015. p. 29-52 (Studies in Media and Communications; Vol. 9).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - The third level digital divide: who benefits most from being online?

AU - van Deursen, Alexander Johannes Aloysius Maria

AU - Helsper, Ellen J.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose Research into the explanations of digital inclusion has moved from investigations of skills and usage to tangible outcomes, what we label here as the third-level digital divide. There is a lack of theoretical development about which types of people are most likely to benefit. Understanding how achieving outcomes of internet use is linked to other types of (dis)advantage is one of the most complex aspects of digital inclusion research because very few reliable and valid measures have been developed. In the current study we took a first step toward creating an operational framework for measuring tangible outcomes of internet use and linking these to the inequalities identified by digital divide research. Methodology/approach After having proposed a classification for internet outcomes, we assessed these outcomes in a representative sample of the Dutch population. Findings Our overall conclusion in relation to the more general relationship between offline resources and third-level digital divides is that the internet remains more beneficial for those with higher social status, not in terms of how extensively they use the technology but in what they achieve as a result of this use for several important domains. Social implications When information and services are offered online, the number of potential outcomes the internet has to offer increases. If individuals with higher social status are taking greater offline advantage from digital engagement than their lower status counterparts, existing offline inequalities could potentially be acerbated

AB - Purpose Research into the explanations of digital inclusion has moved from investigations of skills and usage to tangible outcomes, what we label here as the third-level digital divide. There is a lack of theoretical development about which types of people are most likely to benefit. Understanding how achieving outcomes of internet use is linked to other types of (dis)advantage is one of the most complex aspects of digital inclusion research because very few reliable and valid measures have been developed. In the current study we took a first step toward creating an operational framework for measuring tangible outcomes of internet use and linking these to the inequalities identified by digital divide research. Methodology/approach After having proposed a classification for internet outcomes, we assessed these outcomes in a representative sample of the Dutch population. Findings Our overall conclusion in relation to the more general relationship between offline resources and third-level digital divides is that the internet remains more beneficial for those with higher social status, not in terms of how extensively they use the technology but in what they achieve as a result of this use for several important domains. Social implications When information and services are offered online, the number of potential outcomes the internet has to offer increases. If individuals with higher social status are taking greater offline advantage from digital engagement than their lower status counterparts, existing offline inequalities could potentially be acerbated

KW - IR-97634

KW - METIS-312142

U2 - 10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002

DO - 10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-78441-454-2

T3 - Studies in Media and Communications

SP - 29

EP - 52

BT - Communication and Information Technologies Annual

A2 - Robinson, Laura

A2 - Cotten, Shelia R.

A2 - Schulz, Jeremy

PB - Emerald

ER -

van Deursen AJAM, Helsper EJ. The third level digital divide: who benefits most from being online? In Robinson L, Cotten SR, Schulz J, editors, Communication and Information Technologies Annual. Emerald. 2015. p. 29-52. (Studies in Media and Communications). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002