TY - JOUR
T1 - The TL,NO/TL,CO ratio cannot be used to exclude pulmonary embolism
AU - Fabius, Timon M.
AU - Eijsvogel, Michiel M.
AU - van der Lee, Ivo
AU - Brusse-Keizer, Marjolein
AU - de Jongh, Franciscus H.C.
PY - 2016/11/17
Y1 - 2016/11/17
N2 - Background
The existing screening modalities for pulmonary embolism (PE), such as D-dimer and clinical prediction rules, have low positive predictive values. With its capability to indicate pulmonary vascular abnormalities, the ratio of the transfer factor of the lungs for nitric oxide and the transfer factor of the lungs for carbon monoxide (TL,NO/TL,CO) might be an additional discriminating parameter.
Methods
Carbon monoxide/Nitric oxide diffusion measurements were performed on unselected patients seen on the emergency department for which due to suspected PE a computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) was ordered.
Results
A total of 28 patients were included, PE was found in 12 on CTPA. Median TL,NO/TL,CO ratio was 4·09 (interquartile range (IQR) 3·83–4·40) in the no PE group versus 4·00 (IQR 3·78–4·32) in the PE group (P = 0·959). Median alveolar volume was 77·1% of predicted in the no PE group versus 71·0% of predicted in the PE group (P = 0·353). Median TL,CO was 75·8% of predicted in the no PE group versus 68·8% of predicted in the PE group (P = 0·120). Median TL,NO was 69·3% of predicted in the no PE group versus 60·5% of predicted in the PE group (P = 0·078).
Conclusion
The presented data indicate that the TL,NO/TL,CO ratio cannot be used to exclude PE.
AB - Background
The existing screening modalities for pulmonary embolism (PE), such as D-dimer and clinical prediction rules, have low positive predictive values. With its capability to indicate pulmonary vascular abnormalities, the ratio of the transfer factor of the lungs for nitric oxide and the transfer factor of the lungs for carbon monoxide (TL,NO/TL,CO) might be an additional discriminating parameter.
Methods
Carbon monoxide/Nitric oxide diffusion measurements were performed on unselected patients seen on the emergency department for which due to suspected PE a computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) was ordered.
Results
A total of 28 patients were included, PE was found in 12 on CTPA. Median TL,NO/TL,CO ratio was 4·09 (interquartile range (IQR) 3·83–4·40) in the no PE group versus 4·00 (IQR 3·78–4·32) in the PE group (P = 0·959). Median alveolar volume was 77·1% of predicted in the no PE group versus 71·0% of predicted in the PE group (P = 0·353). Median TL,CO was 75·8% of predicted in the no PE group versus 68·8% of predicted in the PE group (P = 0·120). Median TL,NO was 69·3% of predicted in the no PE group versus 60·5% of predicted in the PE group (P = 0·078).
Conclusion
The presented data indicate that the TL,NO/TL,CO ratio cannot be used to exclude PE.
KW - METIS-316151
KW - IR-99685
U2 - 10.1111/cpf.12317
DO - 10.1111/cpf.12317
M3 - Article
SP - -
JO - Clinical physiology and functional imaging
JF - Clinical physiology and functional imaging
SN - 1475-0961
ER -