Abstract
Political parties play a major role in democratic processes around the world. Recent empirical research suggests that parties are increasingly less important to citizens. Simultaneously, classic and contemporary theories of representative democracy specifically still minimally incorporate accounts of party benefit. This article attempts to reconcile normative political theory on democratic representation with party politics literature. It evaluates party democracy’s value in comparison with its next best theoretical alternative – pluralist democracy with individual representatives – along two different paths. It argues that parties are not flawless, but party democracy is preferable over pluralist democracy. Parties increase predictability and the transparency of policy outcomes. This, in turn, facilitates better accountability between voters and their representatives. In addition, parties save politics from becoming a dispersed and even possibly a contradictory set of actions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 593-613 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | European political science review |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 3 Dec 2014 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2015 |
Keywords
- party democracy
- pluralist democracy
- representative democracy
- normative political theory
- n/a OA procedure