Theoretical foundations of human decision-making in agent-based land use models – A review

Geert J. Groeneveld, B. Müller, C.M. Buchmann, Gunnar Dressler, C. Guo, N. Hase, F. Hoffmann, F. John, C. Klassert, T. Lauf, V. Liebelt, H. Nolzen, N. Pannicke, J. Schulze, H. Weise, N. Schwarz

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent reviews stated that the complex and context-dependent nature of human decision-making resulted in ad-hoc representations of human decision in agent-based land use change models (LUCC ABMs) and that these representations are often not explicitly grounded in theory. However, a systematic survey on the characteristics (e.g. uncertainty, adaptation, learning, interactions and heterogeneities of agents) of representing human decision-making in LUCC ABMs is missing. Therefore, the aim of this study is to inform this debate by reviewing 134 LUCC ABM papers. We show that most human decision sub-models are not explicitly based on a specific theory and if so they are mostly based on economic theories, such as the rational actor, and mainly ignoring other relevant disciplines. Consolidating and enlarging the theoretical basis for modelling human decision-making may be achieved by using a structural framework for modellers, re-using published decision models, learning from other disciplines and fostering collaboration with social scientists.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-48
Number of pages10
JournalEnvironmental modelling & software
Volume87
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

Land use
Decision making
decision making
land use
learning
economic theory
land use change
Economics
modeling
decision
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • Adaptation
  • Heterogeneity
  • Human behaviour
  • Learning
  • Multi-agent systems
  • ODD+D
  • Uncertainty
  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

Cite this

Groeneveld, Geert J. ; Müller, B. ; Buchmann, C.M. ; Dressler, Gunnar ; Guo, C. ; Hase, N. ; Hoffmann, F. ; John, F. ; Klassert, C. ; Lauf, T. ; Liebelt, V. ; Nolzen, H. ; Pannicke, N. ; Schulze, J. ; Weise, H. ; Schwarz, N. / Theoretical foundations of human decision-making in agent-based land use models – A review. In: Environmental modelling & software. 2017 ; Vol. 87. pp. 39-48.
@article{24d3fb284bff42c9a90fa9df8f3ec74d,
title = "Theoretical foundations of human decision-making in agent-based land use models – A review",
abstract = "Recent reviews stated that the complex and context-dependent nature of human decision-making resulted in ad-hoc representations of human decision in agent-based land use change models (LUCC ABMs) and that these representations are often not explicitly grounded in theory. However, a systematic survey on the characteristics (e.g. uncertainty, adaptation, learning, interactions and heterogeneities of agents) of representing human decision-making in LUCC ABMs is missing. Therefore, the aim of this study is to inform this debate by reviewing 134 LUCC ABM papers. We show that most human decision sub-models are not explicitly based on a specific theory and if so they are mostly based on economic theories, such as the rational actor, and mainly ignoring other relevant disciplines. Consolidating and enlarging the theoretical basis for modelling human decision-making may be achieved by using a structural framework for modellers, re-using published decision models, learning from other disciplines and fostering collaboration with social scientists.",
keywords = "Adaptation, Heterogeneity, Human behaviour, Learning, Multi-agent systems, ODD+D, Uncertainty, ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE",
author = "Groeneveld, {Geert J.} and B. M{\"u}ller and C.M. Buchmann and Gunnar Dressler and C. Guo and N. Hase and F. Hoffmann and F. John and C. Klassert and T. Lauf and V. Liebelt and H. Nolzen and N. Pannicke and J. Schulze and H. Weise and N. Schwarz",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.10.008",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "39--48",
journal = "Environmental modelling & software",
issn = "1364-8152",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Groeneveld, GJ, Müller, B, Buchmann, CM, Dressler, G, Guo, C, Hase, N, Hoffmann, F, John, F, Klassert, C, Lauf, T, Liebelt, V, Nolzen, H, Pannicke, N, Schulze, J, Weise, H & Schwarz, N 2017, 'Theoretical foundations of human decision-making in agent-based land use models – A review' Environmental modelling & software, vol. 87, pp. 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.10.008

Theoretical foundations of human decision-making in agent-based land use models – A review. / Groeneveld, Geert J.; Müller, B.; Buchmann, C.M.; Dressler, Gunnar; Guo, C.; Hase, N.; Hoffmann, F.; John, F.; Klassert, C.; Lauf, T.; Liebelt, V.; Nolzen, H.; Pannicke, N.; Schulze, J.; Weise, H.; Schwarz, N.

In: Environmental modelling & software, Vol. 87, 01.01.2017, p. 39-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theoretical foundations of human decision-making in agent-based land use models – A review

AU - Groeneveld, Geert J.

AU - Müller, B.

AU - Buchmann, C.M.

AU - Dressler, Gunnar

AU - Guo, C.

AU - Hase, N.

AU - Hoffmann, F.

AU - John, F.

AU - Klassert, C.

AU - Lauf, T.

AU - Liebelt, V.

AU - Nolzen, H.

AU - Pannicke, N.

AU - Schulze, J.

AU - Weise, H.

AU - Schwarz, N.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Recent reviews stated that the complex and context-dependent nature of human decision-making resulted in ad-hoc representations of human decision in agent-based land use change models (LUCC ABMs) and that these representations are often not explicitly grounded in theory. However, a systematic survey on the characteristics (e.g. uncertainty, adaptation, learning, interactions and heterogeneities of agents) of representing human decision-making in LUCC ABMs is missing. Therefore, the aim of this study is to inform this debate by reviewing 134 LUCC ABM papers. We show that most human decision sub-models are not explicitly based on a specific theory and if so they are mostly based on economic theories, such as the rational actor, and mainly ignoring other relevant disciplines. Consolidating and enlarging the theoretical basis for modelling human decision-making may be achieved by using a structural framework for modellers, re-using published decision models, learning from other disciplines and fostering collaboration with social scientists.

AB - Recent reviews stated that the complex and context-dependent nature of human decision-making resulted in ad-hoc representations of human decision in agent-based land use change models (LUCC ABMs) and that these representations are often not explicitly grounded in theory. However, a systematic survey on the characteristics (e.g. uncertainty, adaptation, learning, interactions and heterogeneities of agents) of representing human decision-making in LUCC ABMs is missing. Therefore, the aim of this study is to inform this debate by reviewing 134 LUCC ABM papers. We show that most human decision sub-models are not explicitly based on a specific theory and if so they are mostly based on economic theories, such as the rational actor, and mainly ignoring other relevant disciplines. Consolidating and enlarging the theoretical basis for modelling human decision-making may be achieved by using a structural framework for modellers, re-using published decision models, learning from other disciplines and fostering collaboration with social scientists.

KW - Adaptation

KW - Heterogeneity

KW - Human behaviour

KW - Learning

KW - Multi-agent systems

KW - ODD+D

KW - Uncertainty

KW - ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://webapps.itc.utwente.nl/library/2017/isi/schwarz_the.pdf

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.10.008

DO - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.10.008

M3 - Review article

VL - 87

SP - 39

EP - 48

JO - Environmental modelling & software

JF - Environmental modelling & software

SN - 1364-8152

ER -