TY - JOUR
T1 - Thermal performance of cold thermal energy storage system with fin and fin–foam structures
AU - Chen, Chuanqi
AU - Diao, Yanhua
AU - Zhao, Yaohua
AU - Wang, Zeyu
AU - Han, Yifa
AU - Wang, Zhen
AU - Liu, Yutong
AU - Fang, Dongran
AU - Zhu, Tingting
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 3192009 ) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51906177 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/6/25
Y1 - 2023/6/25
N2 - The heat transfer performance of most cold thermal energy storage (CTES) devices is limited by the low thermal conductivity of phase change materials (PCMs) and the increase in the thickness of PCMs. A comparative work was performed to explore the heat transfer performance of CTES systems with a fin structure (Fin-CTES) and a fin–foam structure (Fin–foam-CTES). The heat transfer performance, temperature distribution, and thermal effectiveness of Fin-CTES and Fin–foam-CTES at different inlet temperatures and volume flow rates of heat transfer fluid were investigated and compared. Results demonstrated that the overall heat transfer performance of Fin–foam-CTES is better than that of Fin-CTES. However, compared with the PCM in Fin-CTES, that in Fin–foam-CTES has a greater degree of supercooling, reaching 4.35 °C at the maximum. In the discharging (melting) process, Fin-CTES and Fin–foam-CTES have almost similar heat transfer effectiveness, in which the maximum difference is only 0.0107. That is, the enhanced heat transfer effect of the natural convection of the liquid PCM and the metal foam is basically the same during the discharging process.
AB - The heat transfer performance of most cold thermal energy storage (CTES) devices is limited by the low thermal conductivity of phase change materials (PCMs) and the increase in the thickness of PCMs. A comparative work was performed to explore the heat transfer performance of CTES systems with a fin structure (Fin-CTES) and a fin–foam structure (Fin–foam-CTES). The heat transfer performance, temperature distribution, and thermal effectiveness of Fin-CTES and Fin–foam-CTES at different inlet temperatures and volume flow rates of heat transfer fluid were investigated and compared. Results demonstrated that the overall heat transfer performance of Fin–foam-CTES is better than that of Fin-CTES. However, compared with the PCM in Fin-CTES, that in Fin–foam-CTES has a greater degree of supercooling, reaching 4.35 °C at the maximum. In the discharging (melting) process, Fin-CTES and Fin–foam-CTES have almost similar heat transfer effectiveness, in which the maximum difference is only 0.0107. That is, the enhanced heat transfer effect of the natural convection of the liquid PCM and the metal foam is basically the same during the discharging process.
KW - Cold thermal energy storage
KW - Effectiveness
KW - Fin
KW - Heat transfer enhancement
KW - Metal foam
KW - 2023 OA procedure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151282011&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120459
DO - 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120459
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85151282011
SN - 1359-4311
VL - 228
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - Applied thermal engineering
JF - Applied thermal engineering
M1 - 120459
ER -