Thinking outside the box: A neuroscientific perspective on trust in B2B-relationships

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

48 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: The concept of trust suffers from conceptual confusion. The current perspectives on trust within the B2B marketing domain could be visualised as a big box of which the borders are defined by the disciplines marketing, economics, psychology and sociology. The purpose of this paper is to enlarge the box by introducing neuroscientific insights on trust to the B2B marketing domain.

Design/methodology/approach: By a literature study on neuroscientific insights on trust, this paper examines how neuroscience can help to solve existing problems within trust research and how it can address problems that otherwise might not be considered.

Findings: The neural coordinates of trust not only show that trust entails cognitive and affective elements, but also that these elements are so intertwined that they cannot be completely separated. What can and should be separated are the concepts of trust and distrust: the neural coordinates of trust are clearly different from the neural coordinates of distrust. Furthermore, there are personal differences in the ease of trusting others, which are not only caused by previous experiences but also by differences in resting patterns of frontal electroencephalographic asymmetry and by differences in hormonal state.

Research limitations/implications: Specifically, the neural difference between trust and distrust might shape the future research agenda for trust research within industrial marketing. It is likely that the process of distrust goes quick, whereas trust comes more slow. This is reflected in the dual processing theory, which is seen as a paradigm shift in the psychology of reasoning.

Originality/value: New perspectives and directions for trust research are presented. The distinction between trust and distrust is connected to approach- and avoidance-motivated behaviour, which is highly relevant for deepening the studies on trust within industrial marketing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-110
JournalIMP journal
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Distrust
B2B relationships
Marketing
Industrial marketing
Economic sociology
Asymmetry
Paradigm shift
Research agenda
Avoidance
Economic psychology
Design methodology
Psychology
Neuroscience

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • First impressions
  • Trust
  • Distrust
  • Neuroscience
  • Approach-avoidance
  • SOR model

Cite this

@article{22f5be0c2d244649a35073e4a5fe608f,
title = "Thinking outside the box: A neuroscientific perspective on trust in B2B-relationships",
abstract = "Purpose: The concept of trust suffers from conceptual confusion. The current perspectives on trust within the B2B marketing domain could be visualised as a big box of which the borders are defined by the disciplines marketing, economics, psychology and sociology. The purpose of this paper is to enlarge the box by introducing neuroscientific insights on trust to the B2B marketing domain.Design/methodology/approach: By a literature study on neuroscientific insights on trust, this paper examines how neuroscience can help to solve existing problems within trust research and how it can address problems that otherwise might not be considered.Findings: The neural coordinates of trust not only show that trust entails cognitive and affective elements, but also that these elements are so intertwined that they cannot be completely separated. What can and should be separated are the concepts of trust and distrust: the neural coordinates of trust are clearly different from the neural coordinates of distrust. Furthermore, there are personal differences in the ease of trusting others, which are not only caused by previous experiences but also by differences in resting patterns of frontal electroencephalographic asymmetry and by differences in hormonal state.Research limitations/implications: Specifically, the neural difference between trust and distrust might shape the future research agenda for trust research within industrial marketing. It is likely that the process of distrust goes quick, whereas trust comes more slow. This is reflected in the dual processing theory, which is seen as a paradigm shift in the psychology of reasoning.Originality/value: New perspectives and directions for trust research are presented. The distinction between trust and distrust is connected to approach- and avoidance-motivated behaviour, which is highly relevant for deepening the studies on trust within industrial marketing.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D, First impressions, Trust, Distrust, Neuroscience, Approach-avoidance, SOR model",
author = "{van Zeeland-van der Holst}, {Eveline Maria} and J{\"o}rg Henseler",
note = "Emerald Deal",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1108/IMP-03-2017-0011",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "75--110",
journal = "IMP journal",
issn = "2059-1403",
publisher = "Emerald Publishers Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Thinking outside the box : A neuroscientific perspective on trust in B2B-relationships. / van Zeeland-van der Holst, Eveline Maria (Corresponding Author); Henseler, Jörg .

In: IMP journal, Vol. 12, No. 1, 12.03.2018, p. 75-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thinking outside the box

T2 - A neuroscientific perspective on trust in B2B-relationships

AU - van Zeeland-van der Holst, Eveline Maria

AU - Henseler, Jörg

N1 - Emerald Deal

PY - 2018/3/12

Y1 - 2018/3/12

N2 - Purpose: The concept of trust suffers from conceptual confusion. The current perspectives on trust within the B2B marketing domain could be visualised as a big box of which the borders are defined by the disciplines marketing, economics, psychology and sociology. The purpose of this paper is to enlarge the box by introducing neuroscientific insights on trust to the B2B marketing domain.Design/methodology/approach: By a literature study on neuroscientific insights on trust, this paper examines how neuroscience can help to solve existing problems within trust research and how it can address problems that otherwise might not be considered.Findings: The neural coordinates of trust not only show that trust entails cognitive and affective elements, but also that these elements are so intertwined that they cannot be completely separated. What can and should be separated are the concepts of trust and distrust: the neural coordinates of trust are clearly different from the neural coordinates of distrust. Furthermore, there are personal differences in the ease of trusting others, which are not only caused by previous experiences but also by differences in resting patterns of frontal electroencephalographic asymmetry and by differences in hormonal state.Research limitations/implications: Specifically, the neural difference between trust and distrust might shape the future research agenda for trust research within industrial marketing. It is likely that the process of distrust goes quick, whereas trust comes more slow. This is reflected in the dual processing theory, which is seen as a paradigm shift in the psychology of reasoning.Originality/value: New perspectives and directions for trust research are presented. The distinction between trust and distrust is connected to approach- and avoidance-motivated behaviour, which is highly relevant for deepening the studies on trust within industrial marketing.

AB - Purpose: The concept of trust suffers from conceptual confusion. The current perspectives on trust within the B2B marketing domain could be visualised as a big box of which the borders are defined by the disciplines marketing, economics, psychology and sociology. The purpose of this paper is to enlarge the box by introducing neuroscientific insights on trust to the B2B marketing domain.Design/methodology/approach: By a literature study on neuroscientific insights on trust, this paper examines how neuroscience can help to solve existing problems within trust research and how it can address problems that otherwise might not be considered.Findings: The neural coordinates of trust not only show that trust entails cognitive and affective elements, but also that these elements are so intertwined that they cannot be completely separated. What can and should be separated are the concepts of trust and distrust: the neural coordinates of trust are clearly different from the neural coordinates of distrust. Furthermore, there are personal differences in the ease of trusting others, which are not only caused by previous experiences but also by differences in resting patterns of frontal electroencephalographic asymmetry and by differences in hormonal state.Research limitations/implications: Specifically, the neural difference between trust and distrust might shape the future research agenda for trust research within industrial marketing. It is likely that the process of distrust goes quick, whereas trust comes more slow. This is reflected in the dual processing theory, which is seen as a paradigm shift in the psychology of reasoning.Originality/value: New perspectives and directions for trust research are presented. The distinction between trust and distrust is connected to approach- and avoidance-motivated behaviour, which is highly relevant for deepening the studies on trust within industrial marketing.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - First impressions

KW - Trust

KW - Distrust

KW - Neuroscience

KW - Approach-avoidance

KW - SOR model

U2 - 10.1108/IMP-03-2017-0011

DO - 10.1108/IMP-03-2017-0011

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 75

EP - 110

JO - IMP journal

JF - IMP journal

SN - 2059-1403

IS - 1

ER -