Abstract
The authors report on West European trends in follow-up arrangements of national quality assurance procedures. They argue that external quality assurance ought to adopt a broader conception of quality than is now often the case. Next, the general public ought to have a guarantee that external quality assurance is valid (through meta-evaluation) and has consequences (through follow-up arrangements). Follow-up currently is not well developed in many European countries in a formal sense, but is receiving more attention as external quality assurance is maturing. Finally, the authors link national quality assurance to the European dimension; an international network could fulfil important functions in making quality assurance transparent and credible across Europe.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 155-163 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | European journal for education law and policy |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1999 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- European dimension
- Follow-up procedures
- Higher education
- Quality assessment
- Quality assurance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'To be continued .... Syntheses and trends in follow-up of quality assurance in West European higher education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver