To freeze or not to freeze: A culture-sensitive motion capture approach to detecting deceit

Sophie van der Zee, Ronald Poppe, Paul J. Taylor, Ross Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We present a new signal for detecting deception: full body motion. Previous work on detecting deception from body movement has relied either on human judges or on specific gestures (such as fidgeting or gaze aversion) that are coded by humans. While this research has helped to build the foundation of the field, results are often characterized by inconsistent and contradictory findings, with small-stakes lies under lab conditions detected at rates little better than guessing. We examine whether a full body motion capture suit, which records the position, velocity, and orientation of 23 points in the subject’s body, could yield a better signal of deception. Interviewees of South Asian (n = 60) or White British culture (n = 30) were required to either tell the truth or lie about two experienced tasks while being interviewed by somebody from their own (n = 60) or different culture (n = 30). We discovered that full body motion–the sum of joint displacements–was indicative of lying 74.4% of the time. Further analyses indicated that including individual limb data in our full body motion measurements can increase its discriminatory power to 82.2%. Furthermore, movement was guilt- and penitential-related, and occurred independently of anxiety, cognitive load, and cultural background. It appears that full body motion can be an objective nonverbal indicator of deceit, showing that lying does not cause people to freeze.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0215000
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Deception
anxiety
limbs (animal)
Gestures
Guilt
Extremities
Anxiety
Joints
Research

Cite this

van der Zee, Sophie ; Poppe, Ronald ; Taylor, Paul J. ; Anderson, Ross. / To freeze or not to freeze : A culture-sensitive motion capture approach to detecting deceit. In: PLoS ONE. 2019 ; Vol. 14, No. 4.
@article{b12c87fef41d44dcbafee0c3263d3579,
title = "To freeze or not to freeze: A culture-sensitive motion capture approach to detecting deceit",
abstract = "We present a new signal for detecting deception: full body motion. Previous work on detecting deception from body movement has relied either on human judges or on specific gestures (such as fidgeting or gaze aversion) that are coded by humans. While this research has helped to build the foundation of the field, results are often characterized by inconsistent and contradictory findings, with small-stakes lies under lab conditions detected at rates little better than guessing. We examine whether a full body motion capture suit, which records the position, velocity, and orientation of 23 points in the subject’s body, could yield a better signal of deception. Interviewees of South Asian (n = 60) or White British culture (n = 30) were required to either tell the truth or lie about two experienced tasks while being interviewed by somebody from their own (n = 60) or different culture (n = 30). We discovered that full body motion–the sum of joint displacements–was indicative of lying 74.4{\%} of the time. Further analyses indicated that including individual limb data in our full body motion measurements can increase its discriminatory power to 82.2{\%}. Furthermore, movement was guilt- and penitential-related, and occurred independently of anxiety, cognitive load, and cultural background. It appears that full body motion can be an objective nonverbal indicator of deceit, showing that lying does not cause people to freeze.",
author = "{van der Zee}, Sophie and Ronald Poppe and Taylor, {Paul J.} and Ross Anderson",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0215000",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "4",

}

To freeze or not to freeze : A culture-sensitive motion capture approach to detecting deceit. / van der Zee, Sophie; Poppe, Ronald; Taylor, Paul J.; Anderson, Ross.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 4, e0215000, 12.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - To freeze or not to freeze

T2 - A culture-sensitive motion capture approach to detecting deceit

AU - van der Zee, Sophie

AU - Poppe, Ronald

AU - Taylor, Paul J.

AU - Anderson, Ross

PY - 2019/4/12

Y1 - 2019/4/12

N2 - We present a new signal for detecting deception: full body motion. Previous work on detecting deception from body movement has relied either on human judges or on specific gestures (such as fidgeting or gaze aversion) that are coded by humans. While this research has helped to build the foundation of the field, results are often characterized by inconsistent and contradictory findings, with small-stakes lies under lab conditions detected at rates little better than guessing. We examine whether a full body motion capture suit, which records the position, velocity, and orientation of 23 points in the subject’s body, could yield a better signal of deception. Interviewees of South Asian (n = 60) or White British culture (n = 30) were required to either tell the truth or lie about two experienced tasks while being interviewed by somebody from their own (n = 60) or different culture (n = 30). We discovered that full body motion–the sum of joint displacements–was indicative of lying 74.4% of the time. Further analyses indicated that including individual limb data in our full body motion measurements can increase its discriminatory power to 82.2%. Furthermore, movement was guilt- and penitential-related, and occurred independently of anxiety, cognitive load, and cultural background. It appears that full body motion can be an objective nonverbal indicator of deceit, showing that lying does not cause people to freeze.

AB - We present a new signal for detecting deception: full body motion. Previous work on detecting deception from body movement has relied either on human judges or on specific gestures (such as fidgeting or gaze aversion) that are coded by humans. While this research has helped to build the foundation of the field, results are often characterized by inconsistent and contradictory findings, with small-stakes lies under lab conditions detected at rates little better than guessing. We examine whether a full body motion capture suit, which records the position, velocity, and orientation of 23 points in the subject’s body, could yield a better signal of deception. Interviewees of South Asian (n = 60) or White British culture (n = 30) were required to either tell the truth or lie about two experienced tasks while being interviewed by somebody from their own (n = 60) or different culture (n = 30). We discovered that full body motion–the sum of joint displacements–was indicative of lying 74.4% of the time. Further analyses indicated that including individual limb data in our full body motion measurements can increase its discriminatory power to 82.2%. Furthermore, movement was guilt- and penitential-related, and occurred independently of anxiety, cognitive load, and cultural background. It appears that full body motion can be an objective nonverbal indicator of deceit, showing that lying does not cause people to freeze.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064345898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0215000

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0215000

M3 - Article

VL - 14

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 4

M1 - e0215000

ER -