To PPP or not to PPP? (Public-)Private Partnerships involving green gas

Maurits Sanders, Michiel A. Heldeweg, M. Harmsen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademic

Abstract

To realize a proper ‘energy transition’ government has to collaborate with private sector organizations. In the energy sector these latter organizations are often already involved in private-private partnerships for collaboration towards energy transition. The question seems justified if, upon closer analysis, these forms of collaboration also come with some form of (active) input from government. This seems to be the case in the construction of biogas-infrastructures for the production and distribution of green gas. Consequently, this contribution discusses if such collaboration should in fact be labeled as Public-Private Partnership. In the governance debate, this issue is important because in the organization of PPP the public interest (in this case: energy transition) has to be properly safeguarded. On the base of a confrontation between the results from literature study and the results of empirical case study of a biogasinfrastructure in the Dutch region ‘Noordoost Fryslân’, we conclude that governmental influence can take a veiled form by ‘quasi’ private organizations. Law in particular, provides (binding) criteria for safeguarding public interests, such as on transparency, relevant also to the promotion of renewable energy. Public standards for these types of projects has to be sufficiently safeguarded, as regard to their form and content of steering, while at the same time retaining the advantages which ensue from the collaborative character of PPP.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationESEIA-IGS conference Smart and Green Transitions in Cities/Regions; Enschede, 24-25 April 2014
Place of PublicationEnschede
Pages-
Publication statusPublished - 24 Apr 2014
EventESEIA-IGS Conference Smart and Green Transitions in Cities/Regions 2014 - University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
Duration: 24 Apr 201425 Apr 2014
https://www.utwente.nl/igs/eseia/

Conference

ConferenceESEIA-IGS Conference Smart and Green Transitions in Cities/Regions 2014
CountryNetherlands
CityEnschede
Period24/04/1425/04/14
Internet address

Fingerprint

public private partnership
energy
public interest
renewable energy
transparency
private sector
promotion
governance
infrastructure
organization
Law

Keywords

  • METIS-306909
  • IR-92991

Cite this

Sanders, M., Heldeweg, M. A., & Harmsen, M. (2014). To PPP or not to PPP? (Public-)Private Partnerships involving green gas. In ESEIA-IGS conference Smart and Green Transitions in Cities/Regions; Enschede, 24-25 April 2014 (pp. -). Enschede.
Sanders, Maurits ; Heldeweg, Michiel A. ; Harmsen, M. / To PPP or not to PPP? (Public-)Private Partnerships involving green gas. ESEIA-IGS conference Smart and Green Transitions in Cities/Regions; Enschede, 24-25 April 2014. Enschede, 2014. pp. -
@inproceedings{a761136a576c4bfbb83f26a73abda9df,
title = "To PPP or not to PPP? (Public-)Private Partnerships involving green gas",
abstract = "To realize a proper ‘energy transition’ government has to collaborate with private sector organizations. In the energy sector these latter organizations are often already involved in private-private partnerships for collaboration towards energy transition. The question seems justified if, upon closer analysis, these forms of collaboration also come with some form of (active) input from government. This seems to be the case in the construction of biogas-infrastructures for the production and distribution of green gas. Consequently, this contribution discusses if such collaboration should in fact be labeled as Public-Private Partnership. In the governance debate, this issue is important because in the organization of PPP the public interest (in this case: energy transition) has to be properly safeguarded. On the base of a confrontation between the results from literature study and the results of empirical case study of a biogasinfrastructure in the Dutch region ‘Noordoost Frysl{\^a}n’, we conclude that governmental influence can take a veiled form by ‘quasi’ private organizations. Law in particular, provides (binding) criteria for safeguarding public interests, such as on transparency, relevant also to the promotion of renewable energy. Public standards for these types of projects has to be sufficiently safeguarded, as regard to their form and content of steering, while at the same time retaining the advantages which ensue from the collaborative character of PPP.",
keywords = "METIS-306909, IR-92991",
author = "Maurits Sanders and Heldeweg, {Michiel A.} and M. Harmsen",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "24",
language = "English",
pages = "--",
booktitle = "ESEIA-IGS conference Smart and Green Transitions in Cities/Regions; Enschede, 24-25 April 2014",

}

Sanders, M, Heldeweg, MA & Harmsen, M 2014, To PPP or not to PPP? (Public-)Private Partnerships involving green gas. in ESEIA-IGS conference Smart and Green Transitions in Cities/Regions; Enschede, 24-25 April 2014. Enschede, pp. -, ESEIA-IGS Conference Smart and Green Transitions in Cities/Regions 2014, Enschede, Netherlands, 24/04/14.

To PPP or not to PPP? (Public-)Private Partnerships involving green gas. / Sanders, Maurits; Heldeweg, Michiel A.; Harmsen, M.

ESEIA-IGS conference Smart and Green Transitions in Cities/Regions; Enschede, 24-25 April 2014. Enschede, 2014. p. -.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademic

TY - GEN

T1 - To PPP or not to PPP? (Public-)Private Partnerships involving green gas

AU - Sanders, Maurits

AU - Heldeweg, Michiel A.

AU - Harmsen, M.

PY - 2014/4/24

Y1 - 2014/4/24

N2 - To realize a proper ‘energy transition’ government has to collaborate with private sector organizations. In the energy sector these latter organizations are often already involved in private-private partnerships for collaboration towards energy transition. The question seems justified if, upon closer analysis, these forms of collaboration also come with some form of (active) input from government. This seems to be the case in the construction of biogas-infrastructures for the production and distribution of green gas. Consequently, this contribution discusses if such collaboration should in fact be labeled as Public-Private Partnership. In the governance debate, this issue is important because in the organization of PPP the public interest (in this case: energy transition) has to be properly safeguarded. On the base of a confrontation between the results from literature study and the results of empirical case study of a biogasinfrastructure in the Dutch region ‘Noordoost Fryslân’, we conclude that governmental influence can take a veiled form by ‘quasi’ private organizations. Law in particular, provides (binding) criteria for safeguarding public interests, such as on transparency, relevant also to the promotion of renewable energy. Public standards for these types of projects has to be sufficiently safeguarded, as regard to their form and content of steering, while at the same time retaining the advantages which ensue from the collaborative character of PPP.

AB - To realize a proper ‘energy transition’ government has to collaborate with private sector organizations. In the energy sector these latter organizations are often already involved in private-private partnerships for collaboration towards energy transition. The question seems justified if, upon closer analysis, these forms of collaboration also come with some form of (active) input from government. This seems to be the case in the construction of biogas-infrastructures for the production and distribution of green gas. Consequently, this contribution discusses if such collaboration should in fact be labeled as Public-Private Partnership. In the governance debate, this issue is important because in the organization of PPP the public interest (in this case: energy transition) has to be properly safeguarded. On the base of a confrontation between the results from literature study and the results of empirical case study of a biogasinfrastructure in the Dutch region ‘Noordoost Fryslân’, we conclude that governmental influence can take a veiled form by ‘quasi’ private organizations. Law in particular, provides (binding) criteria for safeguarding public interests, such as on transparency, relevant also to the promotion of renewable energy. Public standards for these types of projects has to be sufficiently safeguarded, as regard to their form and content of steering, while at the same time retaining the advantages which ensue from the collaborative character of PPP.

KW - METIS-306909

KW - IR-92991

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - -

BT - ESEIA-IGS conference Smart and Green Transitions in Cities/Regions; Enschede, 24-25 April 2014

CY - Enschede

ER -

Sanders M, Heldeweg MA, Harmsen M. To PPP or not to PPP? (Public-)Private Partnerships involving green gas. In ESEIA-IGS conference Smart and Green Transitions in Cities/Regions; Enschede, 24-25 April 2014. Enschede. 2014. p. -