Abstract
Although the usefulness of evaluating documents has become generally accepted among communication professionals, the supporting research that puts evaluation practices empirically to the test is only beginning to emerge. This article presents an overview of the available research on troubleshooting evaluation methods. Four lines of research are distinguished concerning the validity of evaluation methods, sample composition, sample size, and the implementation of evaluation results during revision
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 242-260 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | IEEE transactions on professional communication |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2000 |
Keywords
- Congruent validity
- Expert judgments
- Formative evaluation
- Human–computer interaction
- Methodology
- Predictive validity
- Reliability
- Revision
- Usability testing
- Validity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Toward a document evaluation methodology: What does research tell us about the validity and reliability of evaluation methods?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Prizes
-
Landmark Paper Award of IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
de Jong, M. D. T. (Recipient) & Schellens, P. J. (Recipient), 2007
Prize: Honorary award