Toward quantifying metrics for rail-system resilience: Identification and analysis of performance weak-resilience-signals

A. de Regt, A.W. Siegel, Johannes Martinus Cornelis Schraagen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
130 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper aims to enhance tangibility of the resilience engineering concept by facilitating understanding and operationalization of weak-resilience-signals (WRS) in the rail sector. Within complex socio-technical systems, accidents can be seen as unwanted outcomes emerging from uncontrolled sources of entropy (functional resonance). Various theoretical models exist to determine the variability of system interactions, the resilience state, and the organization’s intrinsic abilities to reorganize and manage their functioning and adaptive capacity to cope with unexpected and unforeseen disruptions. However, operationalizing and measuring concrete and reliable manifestations of resilience and assessing their impact at a system level, has proven to be a challenge. A multi-method, ethnographic observation and resilience questionnaire, was used to determine resilience baseline conditions at an operational rail traffic control post. This paper describes the development, implementation and initial validation of WRSs identified and modelled around a ‘performance system boundary’. In addition, a WRS analysis function is introduced to interpret underlying factors of the performance WRSs and serves as a method to reveal potential sources of future resonance that could comprise system resilience. Results indicate that performance WRSs can successfully be implemented to accentuate relative deviations from resilience baseline conditions. A WRS analysis function can help to interpret these divergences, and could be used to reveal (creeping) change processes and unnoticed initiating events that facilitate emergence that degrades rail-system resilience. Establishing relevant change signals in advance can contribute to anticipation and awareness, enhance organizational learning and stimulate resilient courses of action and adaptive behavior that ensures rail operation reliability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-331
JournalCognition, technology and work
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2016

Keywords

  • IR-97685
  • METIS-312211

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Toward quantifying metrics for rail-system resilience: Identification and analysis of performance weak-resilience-signals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this