Abstract
The Maastricht project on comparative environmental law; the conference of June 1997 and the work "Comparative Environmental Law in Europe"; similarities and differences in the laws of the Member States; a ius commune?; trends and developments in the Member States; Workshop 1: Public participation, administrative appeals and judicial review (freedom of information; strict participation; locus standi; NIMBY); Workshop 2: Instruments of public environmental law (the introduction of indirect instruments and instruments of self-regulation; action programmes; implementation) ; Workshop 3: Enforcement (sanctions; standing); overall conclusions that structural approaches should be identified; that further research is necessary; that a valuable start has been made, including identifying shared themes and differences.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 40-46 |
| Journal | European Environmental Law Review |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1998 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- n/a OA procedure
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a Ius Commune in public environmental law? Report on the conference on comparative environmental law in the European Union, Maastricht 12-13 June 1997'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver