Towards a more holistic sustainability assessment framework for agro-bioenergy systems: a review

Oludunsin Arodudu, Katharina Helming, Hubert Wiggering, Alexey Voinov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The use of life cycle assessment (LCA) as a sustainability assessment tool for agro-bioenergy system usually has an industrial agriculture bias. Furthermore, LCA generally has often been criticized for being a decision maker tool which may not consider decision takers perceptions. They are lacking in spatial and temporal depth, and unable to assess sufficiently some environmental impact categories such as biodiversity, land use etc. and most economic and social impact categories, e.g. food security, water security, energy security. This study explored tools, methodologies and frameworks that can be deployed individually, as well as in combination with each other for bridging these methodological gaps in application to agro-bioenergy systems. Integrating agronomic options, e.g. alternative farm power, tillage, seed sowing options, fertilizer, pesticide, irrigation into the boundaries of LCAs for agro-bioenergy systems will not only provide an alternative agro-ecological perspective to previous LCAs, but will also lead to the derivation of indicators for assessment of some social and economic impact categories. Deploying life cycle thinking approaches such as energy return on energy invested-EROEI, human appropriation of net primary production-HANPP, net greenhouse gas or carbon balance-NCB, water footprint individually and in combination with each other will also lead to further derivation of indicators suitable for assessing relevant environmental, social and economic impact categories. Also, applying spatio-temporal simulation models has a potential for improving the spatial and temporal depths of LCA analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-75
Number of pages15
JournalEnvironmental impact assessment review
Volume62
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

bioenergy
life cycle assessment
social impact
life cycle
economic impact
sustainability
social effects
energy
environmental impact
water footprint
water
carbon balance
net primary production
food security
sowing
irrigation
simulation model
biodiversity
tillage
decision maker

Keywords

  • METIS-322135
  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

Cite this

@article{8679856e802c45f691156cf761e378a1,
title = "Towards a more holistic sustainability assessment framework for agro-bioenergy systems: a review",
abstract = "The use of life cycle assessment (LCA) as a sustainability assessment tool for agro-bioenergy system usually has an industrial agriculture bias. Furthermore, LCA generally has often been criticized for being a decision maker tool which may not consider decision takers perceptions. They are lacking in spatial and temporal depth, and unable to assess sufficiently some environmental impact categories such as biodiversity, land use etc. and most economic and social impact categories, e.g. food security, water security, energy security. This study explored tools, methodologies and frameworks that can be deployed individually, as well as in combination with each other for bridging these methodological gaps in application to agro-bioenergy systems. Integrating agronomic options, e.g. alternative farm power, tillage, seed sowing options, fertilizer, pesticide, irrigation into the boundaries of LCAs for agro-bioenergy systems will not only provide an alternative agro-ecological perspective to previous LCAs, but will also lead to the derivation of indicators for assessment of some social and economic impact categories. Deploying life cycle thinking approaches such as energy return on energy invested-EROEI, human appropriation of net primary production-HANPP, net greenhouse gas or carbon balance-NCB, water footprint individually and in combination with each other will also lead to further derivation of indicators suitable for assessing relevant environmental, social and economic impact categories. Also, applying spatio-temporal simulation models has a potential for improving the spatial and temporal depths of LCA analysis.",
keywords = "METIS-322135, ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE",
author = "Oludunsin Arodudu and Katharina Helming and Hubert Wiggering and Alexey Voinov",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.eiar.2016.07.008",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "61--75",
journal = "Environmental impact assessment review",
issn = "0195-9255",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Towards a more holistic sustainability assessment framework for agro-bioenergy systems : a review. / Arodudu, Oludunsin; Helming, Katharina; Wiggering, Hubert; Voinov, Alexey .

In: Environmental impact assessment review, Vol. 62, 2017, p. 61-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a more holistic sustainability assessment framework for agro-bioenergy systems

T2 - a review

AU - Arodudu, Oludunsin

AU - Helming, Katharina

AU - Wiggering, Hubert

AU - Voinov, Alexey

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The use of life cycle assessment (LCA) as a sustainability assessment tool for agro-bioenergy system usually has an industrial agriculture bias. Furthermore, LCA generally has often been criticized for being a decision maker tool which may not consider decision takers perceptions. They are lacking in spatial and temporal depth, and unable to assess sufficiently some environmental impact categories such as biodiversity, land use etc. and most economic and social impact categories, e.g. food security, water security, energy security. This study explored tools, methodologies and frameworks that can be deployed individually, as well as in combination with each other for bridging these methodological gaps in application to agro-bioenergy systems. Integrating agronomic options, e.g. alternative farm power, tillage, seed sowing options, fertilizer, pesticide, irrigation into the boundaries of LCAs for agro-bioenergy systems will not only provide an alternative agro-ecological perspective to previous LCAs, but will also lead to the derivation of indicators for assessment of some social and economic impact categories. Deploying life cycle thinking approaches such as energy return on energy invested-EROEI, human appropriation of net primary production-HANPP, net greenhouse gas or carbon balance-NCB, water footprint individually and in combination with each other will also lead to further derivation of indicators suitable for assessing relevant environmental, social and economic impact categories. Also, applying spatio-temporal simulation models has a potential for improving the spatial and temporal depths of LCA analysis.

AB - The use of life cycle assessment (LCA) as a sustainability assessment tool for agro-bioenergy system usually has an industrial agriculture bias. Furthermore, LCA generally has often been criticized for being a decision maker tool which may not consider decision takers perceptions. They are lacking in spatial and temporal depth, and unable to assess sufficiently some environmental impact categories such as biodiversity, land use etc. and most economic and social impact categories, e.g. food security, water security, energy security. This study explored tools, methodologies and frameworks that can be deployed individually, as well as in combination with each other for bridging these methodological gaps in application to agro-bioenergy systems. Integrating agronomic options, e.g. alternative farm power, tillage, seed sowing options, fertilizer, pesticide, irrigation into the boundaries of LCAs for agro-bioenergy systems will not only provide an alternative agro-ecological perspective to previous LCAs, but will also lead to the derivation of indicators for assessment of some social and economic impact categories. Deploying life cycle thinking approaches such as energy return on energy invested-EROEI, human appropriation of net primary production-HANPP, net greenhouse gas or carbon balance-NCB, water footprint individually and in combination with each other will also lead to further derivation of indicators suitable for assessing relevant environmental, social and economic impact categories. Also, applying spatio-temporal simulation models has a potential for improving the spatial and temporal depths of LCA analysis.

KW - METIS-322135

KW - ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

UR - http://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://webapps.itc.utwente.nl/library/2017/isi/voinov_tow.pdf

U2 - 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.07.008

DO - 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.07.008

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 61

EP - 75

JO - Environmental impact assessment review

JF - Environmental impact assessment review

SN - 0195-9255

ER -