Towards a new model for the governance of the Weerribben-Wieden National Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The paper focuses on the governance of the Dutch national park Weerribben-Wieden and its ability to foster ecological resilience in the face of climate change and human disturbances. The study highlights the role of various characteristics of the institutional context of governance in which resilience-relevant decisions are prepared, taken and implemented as referenced by an assessment of the governance context. The relevance of such an assessment is found in the frequent institutional changes in nature policy. This paper examines how care for the resilience in an area is supported by the governance context, given the major recent restructurings. The drastic changes in nature policy in the Netherlands include national government withdrawing from their central role and decentralising the authority for nature tasks to the provinces. Subsequently, the province has also withdrawn itself in the Weerribben-Wieden case and decentralised nature tasks to the municipality. So, in our research case, the ‘take home message’ relates to the impacts of decentralisation in different ‘sizes’. Institutional change by decentralisation does not come in ‘one size’, but rather in a multiform phenomenon of layers and aspects. The governance assessment tool was used to analyze the consequences of this decentralisation for the processes in which resilience measures are implemented in various degrees and interactions. Decentralisation without balanced problem perspectives and goals, without an integral approach towards the park's resilience, and without adequate strategies and instruments, most likely leads to a lengthy transition process with uncertain outcomes. The study concludes that institutional changes in this case restricted adaptiveness of governance towards resilience and has diminished a sense of responsibility for the maintenance of the national park resources.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)56-65
Number of pages10
JournalScience of the total environment
Volume648
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

decentralization
national park
Climate change
disturbance
climate change
resource
province
policy

Keywords

  • Protected area
  • Management
  • Ecosystem services
  • Resilience

Cite this

@article{63321a7619ce429faea8e048a57e078e,
title = "Towards a new model for the governance of the Weerribben-Wieden National Park",
abstract = "The paper focuses on the governance of the Dutch national park Weerribben-Wieden and its ability to foster ecological resilience in the face of climate change and human disturbances. The study highlights the role of various characteristics of the institutional context of governance in which resilience-relevant decisions are prepared, taken and implemented as referenced by an assessment of the governance context. The relevance of such an assessment is found in the frequent institutional changes in nature policy. This paper examines how care for the resilience in an area is supported by the governance context, given the major recent restructurings. The drastic changes in nature policy in the Netherlands include national government withdrawing from their central role and decentralising the authority for nature tasks to the provinces. Subsequently, the province has also withdrawn itself in the Weerribben-Wieden case and decentralised nature tasks to the municipality. So, in our research case, the ‘take home message’ relates to the impacts of decentralisation in different ‘sizes’. Institutional change by decentralisation does not come in ‘one size’, but rather in a multiform phenomenon of layers and aspects. The governance assessment tool was used to analyze the consequences of this decentralisation for the processes in which resilience measures are implemented in various degrees and interactions. Decentralisation without balanced problem perspectives and goals, without an integral approach towards the park's resilience, and without adequate strategies and instruments, most likely leads to a lengthy transition process with uncertain outcomes. The study concludes that institutional changes in this case restricted adaptiveness of governance towards resilience and has diminished a sense of responsibility for the maintenance of the national park resources.",
keywords = "Protected area, Management, Ecosystem services, Resilience",
author = "Maia Lordkipanidze and Kris Lulofs and Hans Bressers",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.121",
language = "English",
volume = "648",
pages = "56--65",
journal = "Science of the total environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Towards a new model for the governance of the Weerribben-Wieden National Park. / Lordkipanidze, Maia (Corresponding Author); Lulofs, Kris; Bressers, Hans.

In: Science of the total environment, Vol. 648, 15.01.2019, p. 56-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a new model for the governance of the Weerribben-Wieden National Park

AU - Lordkipanidze, Maia

AU - Lulofs, Kris

AU - Bressers, Hans

PY - 2019/1/15

Y1 - 2019/1/15

N2 - The paper focuses on the governance of the Dutch national park Weerribben-Wieden and its ability to foster ecological resilience in the face of climate change and human disturbances. The study highlights the role of various characteristics of the institutional context of governance in which resilience-relevant decisions are prepared, taken and implemented as referenced by an assessment of the governance context. The relevance of such an assessment is found in the frequent institutional changes in nature policy. This paper examines how care for the resilience in an area is supported by the governance context, given the major recent restructurings. The drastic changes in nature policy in the Netherlands include national government withdrawing from their central role and decentralising the authority for nature tasks to the provinces. Subsequently, the province has also withdrawn itself in the Weerribben-Wieden case and decentralised nature tasks to the municipality. So, in our research case, the ‘take home message’ relates to the impacts of decentralisation in different ‘sizes’. Institutional change by decentralisation does not come in ‘one size’, but rather in a multiform phenomenon of layers and aspects. The governance assessment tool was used to analyze the consequences of this decentralisation for the processes in which resilience measures are implemented in various degrees and interactions. Decentralisation without balanced problem perspectives and goals, without an integral approach towards the park's resilience, and without adequate strategies and instruments, most likely leads to a lengthy transition process with uncertain outcomes. The study concludes that institutional changes in this case restricted adaptiveness of governance towards resilience and has diminished a sense of responsibility for the maintenance of the national park resources.

AB - The paper focuses on the governance of the Dutch national park Weerribben-Wieden and its ability to foster ecological resilience in the face of climate change and human disturbances. The study highlights the role of various characteristics of the institutional context of governance in which resilience-relevant decisions are prepared, taken and implemented as referenced by an assessment of the governance context. The relevance of such an assessment is found in the frequent institutional changes in nature policy. This paper examines how care for the resilience in an area is supported by the governance context, given the major recent restructurings. The drastic changes in nature policy in the Netherlands include national government withdrawing from their central role and decentralising the authority for nature tasks to the provinces. Subsequently, the province has also withdrawn itself in the Weerribben-Wieden case and decentralised nature tasks to the municipality. So, in our research case, the ‘take home message’ relates to the impacts of decentralisation in different ‘sizes’. Institutional change by decentralisation does not come in ‘one size’, but rather in a multiform phenomenon of layers and aspects. The governance assessment tool was used to analyze the consequences of this decentralisation for the processes in which resilience measures are implemented in various degrees and interactions. Decentralisation without balanced problem perspectives and goals, without an integral approach towards the park's resilience, and without adequate strategies and instruments, most likely leads to a lengthy transition process with uncertain outcomes. The study concludes that institutional changes in this case restricted adaptiveness of governance towards resilience and has diminished a sense of responsibility for the maintenance of the national park resources.

KW - Protected area

KW - Management

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Resilience

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.121

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.121

M3 - Article

VL - 648

SP - 56

EP - 65

JO - Science of the total environment

JF - Science of the total environment

SN - 0048-9697

ER -