Towards relational becoming! an investigation on conflict narratives

Tahereh Barati Bagherabad

Research output: ThesisPhD Thesis - Research external, graduation UTAcademic

58 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study explores the utility of ‘relational being and ‘relational map’ as guiding concepts in the practice of psychotherapy and mediation. This thesis is an exploration and showcase of the transformation of conflict narratives through collaboration and dialogue. Informed by narrative inquiry, relational constructionism, and Deleuze’s ideas on rhizomatic language, my approach is characterized by curiosity, multiple theoretical and narrative voices, and the coconstruction of meaning.

The traditional discourse of psychotherapy is nurtured by dominant discourses of individualism. Psychotherapy and mediation, both developed within the general philosophical framework of individualistic discourses, focus on problems and the centrality of an individual. The result has been a sense of a fixed subjectivity (i.e. a stable and unchanging person) as well as divisiveness, which has led to what many refer to as the “practice of othering.”

In this thesis, the fundamental concepts of individualism are questioned. Alternative discourses emerging within relational and constructionist philosophies are explored and used to illustrate the inadequacy of individualistic accounting. The concept of ‘self’ as relational being is introduced as an alternative to ‘self’ as bounded being (Gergen , 2015). The concept of ‘self’ is used in this study as a theoretical tool, a practical tool and a research tool. This thesis employs discourse analysis and narrative analysis through illustrations that include attention to the negotiation of discursive regimes and their influence on human relations.

The relational analysis of problems in human relations avoids constructing people as determined within discourse and, instead, supports ways of stepping outside of dominant discourses to shape and reshape people’s lives. Collaborative, relational, narrative practices of psychotherapy are illustrated as effective practices that address many sorts of conflict, including those influenced by tradition, power relations, culture, and economics.

The articles in this dissertation are grounded on the assumption that change is afforded by the conversational interactions of therapists and clients in a collaborative, dialogical manner. Participation and collaboration of both parties are central to the development of mutually acceptable interaction. Setting a stage for dialogue is vital in this process, as individuals are invited to experience and re-experience themselves in a dialogical way. This could facilitate steps towards reconciliation and connection between people as relational beings. Drawing on many philosophers and therapists, I examine how the collaborative construction of therapy is accomplished in these articles. I conclude this dissertation with a discussion of the limitations and implications for future investigations.
Original languageEnglish
Awarding Institution
  • University of Twente
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Wilderom, Celeste P.M., Supervisor
  • McNamee, Sheila, Supervisor
Award date28 Mar 2018
Place of PublicationEnschede
Publisher
Print ISBNs978-90-365-4476-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Mar 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

psychotherapy
narrative
discourse
human relations
earning a doctorate
individualism
therapist
mediation
dialogue
interaction
reconciliation
discourse analysis
subjectivity
experience
regime
participation
human being
language
economics

Cite this

Barati Bagherabad, Tahereh. / Towards relational becoming! an investigation on conflict narratives. Enschede : University of Twente, 2018. 110 p.
@phdthesis{ae5722056d274bd4a2c192e57e01cb4c,
title = "Towards relational becoming!: an investigation on conflict narratives",
abstract = "This study explores the utility of ‘relational being and ‘relational map’ as guiding concepts in the practice of psychotherapy and mediation. This thesis is an exploration and showcase of the transformation of conflict narratives through collaboration and dialogue. Informed by narrative inquiry, relational constructionism, and Deleuze’s ideas on rhizomatic language, my approach is characterized by curiosity, multiple theoretical and narrative voices, and the coconstruction of meaning.The traditional discourse of psychotherapy is nurtured by dominant discourses of individualism. Psychotherapy and mediation, both developed within the general philosophical framework of individualistic discourses, focus on problems and the centrality of an individual. The result has been a sense of a fixed subjectivity (i.e. a stable and unchanging person) as well as divisiveness, which has led to what many refer to as the “practice of othering.”In this thesis, the fundamental concepts of individualism are questioned. Alternative discourses emerging within relational and constructionist philosophies are explored and used to illustrate the inadequacy of individualistic accounting. The concept of ‘self’ as relational being is introduced as an alternative to ‘self’ as bounded being (Gergen , 2015). The concept of ‘self’ is used in this study as a theoretical tool, a practical tool and a research tool. This thesis employs discourse analysis and narrative analysis through illustrations that include attention to the negotiation of discursive regimes and their influence on human relations.The relational analysis of problems in human relations avoids constructing people as determined within discourse and, instead, supports ways of stepping outside of dominant discourses to shape and reshape people’s lives. Collaborative, relational, narrative practices of psychotherapy are illustrated as effective practices that address many sorts of conflict, including those influenced by tradition, power relations, culture, and economics.The articles in this dissertation are grounded on the assumption that change is afforded by the conversational interactions of therapists and clients in a collaborative, dialogical manner. Participation and collaboration of both parties are central to the development of mutually acceptable interaction. Setting a stage for dialogue is vital in this process, as individuals are invited to experience and re-experience themselves in a dialogical way. This could facilitate steps towards reconciliation and connection between people as relational beings. Drawing on many philosophers and therapists, I examine how the collaborative construction of therapy is accomplished in these articles. I conclude this dissertation with a discussion of the limitations and implications for future investigations.",
author = "{Barati Bagherabad}, Tahereh",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "28",
doi = "10.3990/1.9789036544764",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-90-365-4476-4",
publisher = "University of Twente",
address = "Netherlands",
school = "University of Twente",

}

Towards relational becoming! an investigation on conflict narratives. / Barati Bagherabad, Tahereh.

Enschede : University of Twente, 2018. 110 p.

Research output: ThesisPhD Thesis - Research external, graduation UTAcademic

TY - THES

T1 - Towards relational becoming!

T2 - an investigation on conflict narratives

AU - Barati Bagherabad, Tahereh

PY - 2018/3/28

Y1 - 2018/3/28

N2 - This study explores the utility of ‘relational being and ‘relational map’ as guiding concepts in the practice of psychotherapy and mediation. This thesis is an exploration and showcase of the transformation of conflict narratives through collaboration and dialogue. Informed by narrative inquiry, relational constructionism, and Deleuze’s ideas on rhizomatic language, my approach is characterized by curiosity, multiple theoretical and narrative voices, and the coconstruction of meaning.The traditional discourse of psychotherapy is nurtured by dominant discourses of individualism. Psychotherapy and mediation, both developed within the general philosophical framework of individualistic discourses, focus on problems and the centrality of an individual. The result has been a sense of a fixed subjectivity (i.e. a stable and unchanging person) as well as divisiveness, which has led to what many refer to as the “practice of othering.”In this thesis, the fundamental concepts of individualism are questioned. Alternative discourses emerging within relational and constructionist philosophies are explored and used to illustrate the inadequacy of individualistic accounting. The concept of ‘self’ as relational being is introduced as an alternative to ‘self’ as bounded being (Gergen , 2015). The concept of ‘self’ is used in this study as a theoretical tool, a practical tool and a research tool. This thesis employs discourse analysis and narrative analysis through illustrations that include attention to the negotiation of discursive regimes and their influence on human relations.The relational analysis of problems in human relations avoids constructing people as determined within discourse and, instead, supports ways of stepping outside of dominant discourses to shape and reshape people’s lives. Collaborative, relational, narrative practices of psychotherapy are illustrated as effective practices that address many sorts of conflict, including those influenced by tradition, power relations, culture, and economics.The articles in this dissertation are grounded on the assumption that change is afforded by the conversational interactions of therapists and clients in a collaborative, dialogical manner. Participation and collaboration of both parties are central to the development of mutually acceptable interaction. Setting a stage for dialogue is vital in this process, as individuals are invited to experience and re-experience themselves in a dialogical way. This could facilitate steps towards reconciliation and connection between people as relational beings. Drawing on many philosophers and therapists, I examine how the collaborative construction of therapy is accomplished in these articles. I conclude this dissertation with a discussion of the limitations and implications for future investigations.

AB - This study explores the utility of ‘relational being and ‘relational map’ as guiding concepts in the practice of psychotherapy and mediation. This thesis is an exploration and showcase of the transformation of conflict narratives through collaboration and dialogue. Informed by narrative inquiry, relational constructionism, and Deleuze’s ideas on rhizomatic language, my approach is characterized by curiosity, multiple theoretical and narrative voices, and the coconstruction of meaning.The traditional discourse of psychotherapy is nurtured by dominant discourses of individualism. Psychotherapy and mediation, both developed within the general philosophical framework of individualistic discourses, focus on problems and the centrality of an individual. The result has been a sense of a fixed subjectivity (i.e. a stable and unchanging person) as well as divisiveness, which has led to what many refer to as the “practice of othering.”In this thesis, the fundamental concepts of individualism are questioned. Alternative discourses emerging within relational and constructionist philosophies are explored and used to illustrate the inadequacy of individualistic accounting. The concept of ‘self’ as relational being is introduced as an alternative to ‘self’ as bounded being (Gergen , 2015). The concept of ‘self’ is used in this study as a theoretical tool, a practical tool and a research tool. This thesis employs discourse analysis and narrative analysis through illustrations that include attention to the negotiation of discursive regimes and their influence on human relations.The relational analysis of problems in human relations avoids constructing people as determined within discourse and, instead, supports ways of stepping outside of dominant discourses to shape and reshape people’s lives. Collaborative, relational, narrative practices of psychotherapy are illustrated as effective practices that address many sorts of conflict, including those influenced by tradition, power relations, culture, and economics.The articles in this dissertation are grounded on the assumption that change is afforded by the conversational interactions of therapists and clients in a collaborative, dialogical manner. Participation and collaboration of both parties are central to the development of mutually acceptable interaction. Setting a stage for dialogue is vital in this process, as individuals are invited to experience and re-experience themselves in a dialogical way. This could facilitate steps towards reconciliation and connection between people as relational beings. Drawing on many philosophers and therapists, I examine how the collaborative construction of therapy is accomplished in these articles. I conclude this dissertation with a discussion of the limitations and implications for future investigations.

U2 - 10.3990/1.9789036544764

DO - 10.3990/1.9789036544764

M3 - PhD Thesis - Research external, graduation UT

SN - 978-90-365-4476-4

PB - University of Twente

CY - Enschede

ER -