Towards valid score reports in the Computer Program LOVS: A redesign study

Fabienne van der Kleij, Theodorus Johannes Hendrikus Maria Eggen, Ronald J.H. Engelen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    14 Citations (Scopus)
    1 Downloads (Pure)


    Supporting users in interpreting assessment results is an important but underexposed aspect of validity. This study investigated how the score reports from the pupil-monitoring Computer Program LOVS can be redesigned in a way that supports users in interpreting pupils’ test results. In several rounds of consultations and designs with users and experts using design principles from the literature, alternative designs for the reports were created and field tested. No clear differences were found in terms of users’ interpretation accuracy between the original and the redesigned reports. However, users’ perceptions of the redesigned reports were predominantly positive. The authors emphasise the need for involvement of experts and users in the design process to ensure the validity of reports.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)24-39
    JournalStudies in educational evaluation
    Publication statusPublished - 2014


    • IR-93866
    • METIS-308521


    Dive into the research topics of 'Towards valid score reports in the Computer Program LOVS: A redesign study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this