Transcending the Myth of Law’s Stifling Technological Innovation: How Adaptive Drug Licensing Processes Are Maintaining Legitimate Regulatory Connections

Barbel R. Dorbeck-Jung

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterProfessional

Abstract

This chapter explores the lessons that can be drawn from how adaptive drug licensing processes cope with legitimacy issues of regulatory connections. The exploration assumes that a responsive approach to technology regulation offers opportunities to meet legitimacy requirements. Looking at existing and proposed adaptive drug licensing pathways through the lens of this theoretical frame we see a realistic responsive approach to regulation. By indicating that adaptive licensing can bring beneficial medicinal drugs earlier to patients this approach seems to be equipped to transcend the myth of law’s stifling technological innovation. The evaluation of the current stage of adaptive drug licensing leads to three tentative lessons. First, a shared interest, accompanied by strong drivers and enablers, is crucial; second, ongoing prudent coordination of a leading regulatory agency is essential; third, to ensure that new responsibilities and the norms of participation, transparency, integrity, and accountability are taken seriously a new social contract can be supportive.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation and Technology
EditorsRoger Brownsword, Eloise Scotford, Karen Yeung
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Print)9780199680832
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transcending the Myth of Law’s Stifling Technological Innovation: How Adaptive Drug Licensing Processes Are Maintaining Legitimate Regulatory Connections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this