Two perspectives on trading in radio spectrum usage rights: coase and commons compared

Wolter Lemstra, John Groenewegen, Pieter de Vries, Rajen Akalu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
78 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this contribution, we address the introduction of private property rights and market trades in the use of the radio frequency spectrum. We discuss the UK case being inspired by the ideas of Coase. We discuss how an appropriate design of property rights and a secondary market would look like and how the developments after the introduction of property rights could be interpreted. Subsequently we present the alternative perspective of Commons to illuminate the implications of a Coasean perspective. It is shown how Coase's focus is on efficiency, whereas in the world of Commons, the societal value is central. We discuss how the two perspectives can contribute to the understanding of the governance of the radio spectrum and conclude with policy recommendations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)437-457
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of institutional economics
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Dec 2014

Fingerprint

Property rights
Coase
Governance
Secondary market
Radio frequency
Property market
Private property

Keywords

  • METIS-309183
  • IR-94243

Cite this

Lemstra, Wolter ; Groenewegen, John ; de Vries, Pieter ; Akalu, Rajen. / Two perspectives on trading in radio spectrum usage rights: coase and commons compared. In: Journal of institutional economics. 2014 ; Vol. 11, No. 2. pp. 437-457.
@article{5c0a030712d646af8aebcc8c2e11bf5a,
title = "Two perspectives on trading in radio spectrum usage rights: coase and commons compared",
abstract = "In this contribution, we address the introduction of private property rights and market trades in the use of the radio frequency spectrum. We discuss the UK case being inspired by the ideas of Coase. We discuss how an appropriate design of property rights and a secondary market would look like and how the developments after the introduction of property rights could be interpreted. Subsequently we present the alternative perspective of Commons to illuminate the implications of a Coasean perspective. It is shown how Coase's focus is on efficiency, whereas in the world of Commons, the societal value is central. We discuss how the two perspectives can contribute to the understanding of the governance of the radio spectrum and conclude with policy recommendations.",
keywords = "METIS-309183, IR-94243",
author = "Wolter Lemstra and John Groenewegen and {de Vries}, Pieter and Rajen Akalu",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1017/S1744137414000563",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "437--457",
journal = "Journal of institutional economics",
issn = "1744-1374",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Two perspectives on trading in radio spectrum usage rights: coase and commons compared. / Lemstra, Wolter; Groenewegen, John; de Vries, Pieter; Akalu, Rajen.

In: Journal of institutional economics, Vol. 11, No. 2, 09.12.2014, p. 437-457.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two perspectives on trading in radio spectrum usage rights: coase and commons compared

AU - Lemstra, Wolter

AU - Groenewegen, John

AU - de Vries, Pieter

AU - Akalu, Rajen

PY - 2014/12/9

Y1 - 2014/12/9

N2 - In this contribution, we address the introduction of private property rights and market trades in the use of the radio frequency spectrum. We discuss the UK case being inspired by the ideas of Coase. We discuss how an appropriate design of property rights and a secondary market would look like and how the developments after the introduction of property rights could be interpreted. Subsequently we present the alternative perspective of Commons to illuminate the implications of a Coasean perspective. It is shown how Coase's focus is on efficiency, whereas in the world of Commons, the societal value is central. We discuss how the two perspectives can contribute to the understanding of the governance of the radio spectrum and conclude with policy recommendations.

AB - In this contribution, we address the introduction of private property rights and market trades in the use of the radio frequency spectrum. We discuss the UK case being inspired by the ideas of Coase. We discuss how an appropriate design of property rights and a secondary market would look like and how the developments after the introduction of property rights could be interpreted. Subsequently we present the alternative perspective of Commons to illuminate the implications of a Coasean perspective. It is shown how Coase's focus is on efficiency, whereas in the world of Commons, the societal value is central. We discuss how the two perspectives can contribute to the understanding of the governance of the radio spectrum and conclude with policy recommendations.

KW - METIS-309183

KW - IR-94243

U2 - 10.1017/S1744137414000563

DO - 10.1017/S1744137414000563

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 437

EP - 457

JO - Journal of institutional economics

JF - Journal of institutional economics

SN - 1744-1374

IS - 2

ER -