Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | S93-S93 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 11 Mar 2016 |
| Event | 10th European Breast Cancer Conference (EBCC-10) : Multidisciplinary Innovation in Breast Cancer Care - RAI Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands Duration: 9 Mar 2016 → 11 Mar 2016 Conference number: 10 |
Conference
| Conference | 10th European Breast Cancer Conference (EBCC-10) |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | EBCC |
| Country | Netherlands |
| City | Amsterdam |
| Period | 9/03/16 → 11/03/16 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- METIS-316254
- IR-100066
Cite this
}
Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer in the Netherlands. / Spronk, P.E.R.; van Bommel, A.C.M.; Siesling, S.; Baas-Vrancken Peeters, M.J.T.; Smorenburg, C.H.
2016. S93-S93 Abstract from 10th European Breast Cancer Conference (EBCC-10) , Amsterdam, Netherlands.Research output: Contribution to conference › Abstract › Other research output
TY - CONF
T1 - Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer in the Netherlands
AU - Spronk, P.E.R.
AU - van Bommel, A.C.M.
AU - Siesling, S.
AU - Baas-Vrancken Peeters, M.J.T.
AU - Smorenburg, C.H.
PY - 2016/3/11
Y1 - 2016/3/11
N2 - Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer in the Netherlands P.E.R. Spronk1, A.C.M. Van Bommel1, S. Siesling2,3, M.J.T. Baas- Vrancken Peeters4, C.H. Smorenburg5. 1Leiden University Medical Centre, Surgery, Leiden, Netherlands; 2Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands IKNL, Epidemiology, Utrecht, Netherlands; 3University of Twente, MIRA Biomedical science and Technical Medicine, Twente, Netherlands; 4Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 5Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). The aim of this study is to examine the use of NAC for LABC in all Dutch hospitals participating in breast cancer care and to assess what patient, tumour and hospital characteristics influence its use. Material and Methods: Data were derived from the national multidisciplinary NABON Breast Cancer Audit (NBCA), regarding all women aged >18 years and newly diagnosed with LABC from January 2011 to September 2013. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between the use of NAC and patient, tumour and hospital related factors. Results: Of 1419 woman diagnosed with LABC, 70% were treated with NAC. This percentage varied from 12.5% to 90% between hospitals and did not increase over time. Factors associated with the use of NAC included young age, large tumour size, more advanced nodal disease and triple negative or hormone-receptor negative tumours. Also patients treated in hospitals with a multidisciplinary preoperative work-up and participation in neoadjuvant studies were more likely to receive NAC. However, considerable variation between hospitals remained after casemix correction. Table 1. Multivariable odds ratios (ORs) for receipt of NAC among 1419 stage III patients 2011 through 2013 OR 95% CI P-value Age 0.000 <40 0.92 0.44−1.94 40−49 ref. 50−59 0.67 0.41−1.09 60−69 0.51 0.31−0.84 70 0.03 0.02−0.05 Histologic subtype 0.145 ductal ref. lobular 0.58 0.34−0.98 both 1.19 0.33−4.29 other 0.55 0.20−1.53 Multifocal 0.997 yes ref. no 1.00 0.67−1.50 Tumor size 0.000 5 cm ref. >5 cm 5.68 2.34−13.79 Clinical nodal status 0.000 cNx/N0 ref. cN1 1.32 0.86−2.04 cN2 2.93 1.18−7.29 cN3 10.28 4.18−25.25 Receptor status 0.000 Triple negative 2.35 1.40−3.93 HR−, Her2+ 3.37 1.67−6.78 HR+, Her2+ 0.91 0.51−1.60 HR+, Her2− ref. Type of surgery 0.026 Breast conservation therapy 2.05 1.09−3.84 Mastectomy ref. Multidisciplinary team 0.021 Yes 1.98 1.11−3.53 No ref. Type of hospital 0.569 General 1.20 0.73−1.98 Top clinical ref. Academic 1.50 0.64−3.47 Hospital surgical volume 0.729 <100 1.19 0.69−2.06 100–200 ref. >200 1.27 0.70−2.31 Study participation 0.005 Yes 1.80 1.20−2.70 No ref. Conclusions: There is considerable variation in the use of NAC for LABC in the Netherlands. Although various patient, tumor and institutional factors are associated with the use of NAC in LABC, these can only explain part of the observed variation in treatment patterns between hospitals.
AB - Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer in the Netherlands P.E.R. Spronk1, A.C.M. Van Bommel1, S. Siesling2,3, M.J.T. Baas- Vrancken Peeters4, C.H. Smorenburg5. 1Leiden University Medical Centre, Surgery, Leiden, Netherlands; 2Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands IKNL, Epidemiology, Utrecht, Netherlands; 3University of Twente, MIRA Biomedical science and Technical Medicine, Twente, Netherlands; 4Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 5Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). The aim of this study is to examine the use of NAC for LABC in all Dutch hospitals participating in breast cancer care and to assess what patient, tumour and hospital characteristics influence its use. Material and Methods: Data were derived from the national multidisciplinary NABON Breast Cancer Audit (NBCA), regarding all women aged >18 years and newly diagnosed with LABC from January 2011 to September 2013. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between the use of NAC and patient, tumour and hospital related factors. Results: Of 1419 woman diagnosed with LABC, 70% were treated with NAC. This percentage varied from 12.5% to 90% between hospitals and did not increase over time. Factors associated with the use of NAC included young age, large tumour size, more advanced nodal disease and triple negative or hormone-receptor negative tumours. Also patients treated in hospitals with a multidisciplinary preoperative work-up and participation in neoadjuvant studies were more likely to receive NAC. However, considerable variation between hospitals remained after casemix correction. Table 1. Multivariable odds ratios (ORs) for receipt of NAC among 1419 stage III patients 2011 through 2013 OR 95% CI P-value Age 0.000 <40 0.92 0.44−1.94 40−49 ref. 50−59 0.67 0.41−1.09 60−69 0.51 0.31−0.84 70 0.03 0.02−0.05 Histologic subtype 0.145 ductal ref. lobular 0.58 0.34−0.98 both 1.19 0.33−4.29 other 0.55 0.20−1.53 Multifocal 0.997 yes ref. no 1.00 0.67−1.50 Tumor size 0.000 5 cm ref. >5 cm 5.68 2.34−13.79 Clinical nodal status 0.000 cNx/N0 ref. cN1 1.32 0.86−2.04 cN2 2.93 1.18−7.29 cN3 10.28 4.18−25.25 Receptor status 0.000 Triple negative 2.35 1.40−3.93 HR−, Her2+ 3.37 1.67−6.78 HR+, Her2+ 0.91 0.51−1.60 HR+, Her2− ref. Type of surgery 0.026 Breast conservation therapy 2.05 1.09−3.84 Mastectomy ref. Multidisciplinary team 0.021 Yes 1.98 1.11−3.53 No ref. Type of hospital 0.569 General 1.20 0.73−1.98 Top clinical ref. Academic 1.50 0.64−3.47 Hospital surgical volume 0.729 <100 1.19 0.69−2.06 100–200 ref. >200 1.27 0.70−2.31 Study participation 0.005 Yes 1.80 1.20−2.70 No ref. Conclusions: There is considerable variation in the use of NAC for LABC in the Netherlands. Although various patient, tumor and institutional factors are associated with the use of NAC in LABC, these can only explain part of the observed variation in treatment patterns between hospitals.
KW - METIS-316254
KW - IR-100066
M3 - Abstract
SP - S93-S93
ER -