Using aptitude measurements for the optimal assignment of subjects to treatments with and without mastery scores

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

14 Citations (Scopus)
464 Downloads (Pure)


For assigning subjects to treatments the point of intersection of within-group regression lines is ordinarily used as the critical point. This decision rule is critized and, for several utility functions and any number of treatments, replaced by optimal monotone, nonrandomized (Bayes) rules. Both treatments with and without mastery scores are considered. Moreover, the effect of unreliable criterion scores on the optimal decision rule is examined, and it is illustrated how qualitative information can be combined with aptitude measurements to improve treatment assignment decisions. Although the models in this paper are presented with special reference to the aptitude-treatment interaction problem in education, it is indicated that they apply to a variety of situations in which subjects are assigned to treatments on the basis of some predictor score, as long as there are no allocation quota considerations.
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)257-274
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1981


  • IR-60239

Cite this