Using multiple watershed models to predict water, nitrogen, and phosphorus discharges to the Patuxent estuary

Kathleen M.B. Boomer, Donald E. Weller, Thomas E. Jordan, Lewis Linker, Zhi-Jun Liu, James Reilly, Gary Schenk, A. Voinov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We analyzed an ensemble of watershed models that predict flow, nitrogen, and phosphorus discharges. The models differed in scope and complexity and used different input data, but all had been applied to evaluate human impacts on discharges to the Patuxent River or to the Chesapeake Bay. We compared predictions to observations of average annual, annual time series, and monthly discharge leaving three basins. No model consistently matched observed discharges better than the others, and predictions differed as much as 150% for every basin. Models that agreed best with the observations in one basin often were among the worst models for another material or basin. Combining model predictions into a model average improved overall reliability in matching observations, and the range of predictions helped describe uncertainty. The model average was not the closest to the observed discharge for every material, basin, and time frame, but the model average had the highest Nash–Sutcliffe performance across all combinations. Consistently poor performance in predicting phosphorus loads suggests that none of the models capture major controls. Differences among model predictions came from differences in model structures, input data, and the time period considered, and also to errors in the observed discharge. Ensemble watershed modeling helped identify research needs and quantify the uncertainties that should be considered when using the models in management decisions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-39
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of the American Water Resources Association
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

estuary
watershed
phosphorus
nitrogen
water
prediction
basin
anthropogenic effect
time series
river

Keywords

  • METIS-295785
  • IR-98732
  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

Cite this

Boomer, Kathleen M.B. ; Weller, Donald E. ; Jordan, Thomas E. ; Linker, Lewis ; Liu, Zhi-Jun ; Reilly, James ; Schenk, Gary ; Voinov, A. / Using multiple watershed models to predict water, nitrogen, and phosphorus discharges to the Patuxent estuary. In: Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 2013 ; Vol. 49, No. 1. pp. 15-39.
@article{d2bf66ccf3fe45639d685578d950aabe,
title = "Using multiple watershed models to predict water, nitrogen, and phosphorus discharges to the Patuxent estuary",
abstract = "We analyzed an ensemble of watershed models that predict flow, nitrogen, and phosphorus discharges. The models differed in scope and complexity and used different input data, but all had been applied to evaluate human impacts on discharges to the Patuxent River or to the Chesapeake Bay. We compared predictions to observations of average annual, annual time series, and monthly discharge leaving three basins. No model consistently matched observed discharges better than the others, and predictions differed as much as 150{\%} for every basin. Models that agreed best with the observations in one basin often were among the worst models for another material or basin. Combining model predictions into a model average improved overall reliability in matching observations, and the range of predictions helped describe uncertainty. The model average was not the closest to the observed discharge for every material, basin, and time frame, but the model average had the highest Nash–Sutcliffe performance across all combinations. Consistently poor performance in predicting phosphorus loads suggests that none of the models capture major controls. Differences among model predictions came from differences in model structures, input data, and the time period considered, and also to errors in the observed discharge. Ensemble watershed modeling helped identify research needs and quantify the uncertainties that should be considered when using the models in management decisions.",
keywords = "METIS-295785, IR-98732, ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE",
author = "Boomer, {Kathleen M.B.} and Weller, {Donald E.} and Jordan, {Thomas E.} and Lewis Linker and Zhi-Jun Liu and James Reilly and Gary Schenk and A. Voinov",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00689.x",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "15--39",
journal = "Journal of the American Water Resources Association",
issn = "1093-474X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Using multiple watershed models to predict water, nitrogen, and phosphorus discharges to the Patuxent estuary. / Boomer, Kathleen M.B.; Weller, Donald E.; Jordan, Thomas E.; Linker, Lewis; Liu, Zhi-Jun; Reilly, James; Schenk, Gary; Voinov, A.

In: Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2013, p. 15-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using multiple watershed models to predict water, nitrogen, and phosphorus discharges to the Patuxent estuary

AU - Boomer, Kathleen M.B.

AU - Weller, Donald E.

AU - Jordan, Thomas E.

AU - Linker, Lewis

AU - Liu, Zhi-Jun

AU - Reilly, James

AU - Schenk, Gary

AU - Voinov, A.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - We analyzed an ensemble of watershed models that predict flow, nitrogen, and phosphorus discharges. The models differed in scope and complexity and used different input data, but all had been applied to evaluate human impacts on discharges to the Patuxent River or to the Chesapeake Bay. We compared predictions to observations of average annual, annual time series, and monthly discharge leaving three basins. No model consistently matched observed discharges better than the others, and predictions differed as much as 150% for every basin. Models that agreed best with the observations in one basin often were among the worst models for another material or basin. Combining model predictions into a model average improved overall reliability in matching observations, and the range of predictions helped describe uncertainty. The model average was not the closest to the observed discharge for every material, basin, and time frame, but the model average had the highest Nash–Sutcliffe performance across all combinations. Consistently poor performance in predicting phosphorus loads suggests that none of the models capture major controls. Differences among model predictions came from differences in model structures, input data, and the time period considered, and also to errors in the observed discharge. Ensemble watershed modeling helped identify research needs and quantify the uncertainties that should be considered when using the models in management decisions.

AB - We analyzed an ensemble of watershed models that predict flow, nitrogen, and phosphorus discharges. The models differed in scope and complexity and used different input data, but all had been applied to evaluate human impacts on discharges to the Patuxent River or to the Chesapeake Bay. We compared predictions to observations of average annual, annual time series, and monthly discharge leaving three basins. No model consistently matched observed discharges better than the others, and predictions differed as much as 150% for every basin. Models that agreed best with the observations in one basin often were among the worst models for another material or basin. Combining model predictions into a model average improved overall reliability in matching observations, and the range of predictions helped describe uncertainty. The model average was not the closest to the observed discharge for every material, basin, and time frame, but the model average had the highest Nash–Sutcliffe performance across all combinations. Consistently poor performance in predicting phosphorus loads suggests that none of the models capture major controls. Differences among model predictions came from differences in model structures, input data, and the time period considered, and also to errors in the observed discharge. Ensemble watershed modeling helped identify research needs and quantify the uncertainties that should be considered when using the models in management decisions.

KW - METIS-295785

KW - IR-98732

KW - ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00689.x

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://webapps.itc.utwente.nl/library/2013/isi/voinov_use.pdf

U2 - 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00689.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00689.x

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 15

EP - 39

JO - Journal of the American Water Resources Association

JF - Journal of the American Water Resources Association

SN - 1093-474X

IS - 1

ER -