TY - JOUR
T1 - Using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state
T2 - Six recommendations to avoid common pitfalls
AU - Brouwer, Anne-Marie
AU - Zander, Thorsten O.
AU - van Erp, Jan B.F.
AU - Korteling, Johannes E.
AU - Bronkhorst, Adelbert W.
PY - 2015/4/30
Y1 - 2015/4/30
N2 - Estimating cognitive or affective state from neurophysiological signals and designing applications that make use of this information requires expertise in many disciplines such as neurophysiology, machine learning, experimental psychology, and human factors. This makes it difficult to perform research that is strong in all its aspects as well as to judge a study or application on its merits. On the occasion of the special topic “Using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state‿ we here summarize often occurring pitfalls and recommendations on how to avoid them, both for authors (researchers) and readers. They relate to defining the state of interest, the neurophysiological processes that are expected to be involved in the state of interest, confounding factors, inadvertently “cheating‿ with classification analyses, insight on what underlies successful state estimation, and finally, the added value of neurophysiological measures in the context of an application. We hope that this paper will support the community in producing high quality studies and well-validated, useful applications.
AB - Estimating cognitive or affective state from neurophysiological signals and designing applications that make use of this information requires expertise in many disciplines such as neurophysiology, machine learning, experimental psychology, and human factors. This makes it difficult to perform research that is strong in all its aspects as well as to judge a study or application on its merits. On the occasion of the special topic “Using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state‿ we here summarize often occurring pitfalls and recommendations on how to avoid them, both for authors (researchers) and readers. They relate to defining the state of interest, the neurophysiological processes that are expected to be involved in the state of interest, confounding factors, inadvertently “cheating‿ with classification analyses, insight on what underlies successful state estimation, and finally, the added value of neurophysiological measures in the context of an application. We hope that this paper will support the community in producing high quality studies and well-validated, useful applications.
KW - EEG
KW - Neuroergonomics
KW - Passive BCI
KW - Physiological computing
KW - Affective Computing
KW - Applied neuroscience
KW - Mental state estimation
U2 - 10.3389/fnins.2015.00136
DO - 10.3389/fnins.2015.00136
M3 - Article
SN - 1662-5161
VL - 9
SP - 136
JO - Frontiers in human neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in human neuroscience
ER -