Abstract
In this paper we argue that theories of party choice are implicitly not about choice, but about
electoral preferences or utilities. This distinction is not trivial, as individual choice can be
deduced from individual preferences or utilities, whereas the reverse is not necessarily true. In
spite of this, a large part of empirical electoral research is (implicitly) based on the analysis of
‘revealed’ preferences, i.e. preferences that have been deduced from choice by using
interpersonal comparison to make up the informational deficit at the individual level. We
argue that the risks of this approach can be avoided by an alternative approach, that entails the
empirical observation of electoral utility. A practical procedure for doing so is presented, and
some validating analyses are reported.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 19 |
Publication status | Published - 2003 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops 2003 - University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom Duration: 28 Mar 2003 → 2 Apr 2003 |
Conference
Conference | ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops 2003 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Edinburgh |
Period | 28/03/03 → 2/04/03 |
Keywords
- IR-61249