Validating and optimizing the effects of model progression in simulation-based inquiry learning

Y.G. Mulder, Adrianus W. Lazonder, Ton de Jong, Anjo Allert Anjewierden, Lars Bollen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)
36 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Model progression denotes the organization of the inquiry learning process in successive phases of increasing complexity. This study investigated the effectiveness of model progression in general, and explored the added value of either broadening or narrowing students’ possibilities to change model progression phases. Results showed that high-school students in the ‘standard’ model progression condition (n = 19), who could enter subsequent phases at will, outperformed students from a control condition (n = 30) without model progression. The unrestricted condition (n = 22) had the additional option of returning to previous phases, whereas the restricted condition (n = 20) disallowed such downward progressions as well as upward progressions in case insufficient knowledge was acquired. Both variants were found to be more effective in terms of performance than the ‘standard’ form of model progression. However, as performance in all three model progression conditions was still rather weak, additional support is needed for students to reach full understanding of the learning content.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)722-729
JournalJournal of science education and technology
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

simulation
learning
Students
student
value added
performance
learning process
organization
school

Keywords

  • METIS-291862
  • IR-82935

Cite this

@article{d67d7a184e444f5390b90729934531b8,
title = "Validating and optimizing the effects of model progression in simulation-based inquiry learning",
abstract = "Model progression denotes the organization of the inquiry learning process in successive phases of increasing complexity. This study investigated the effectiveness of model progression in general, and explored the added value of either broadening or narrowing students’ possibilities to change model progression phases. Results showed that high-school students in the ‘standard’ model progression condition (n = 19), who could enter subsequent phases at will, outperformed students from a control condition (n = 30) without model progression. The unrestricted condition (n = 22) had the additional option of returning to previous phases, whereas the restricted condition (n = 20) disallowed such downward progressions as well as upward progressions in case insufficient knowledge was acquired. Both variants were found to be more effective in terms of performance than the ‘standard’ form of model progression. However, as performance in all three model progression conditions was still rather weak, additional support is needed for students to reach full understanding of the learning content.",
keywords = "METIS-291862, IR-82935",
author = "Y.G. Mulder and Lazonder, {Adrianus W.} and {de Jong}, Ton and Anjewierden, {Anjo Allert} and Lars Bollen",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1007/s10956-011-9360-x",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "722--729",
journal = "Journal of science education and technology",
issn = "1059-0145",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

Validating and optimizing the effects of model progression in simulation-based inquiry learning. / Mulder, Y.G.; Lazonder, Adrianus W.; de Jong, Ton; Anjewierden, Anjo Allert; Bollen, Lars.

In: Journal of science education and technology, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2012, p. 722-729.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validating and optimizing the effects of model progression in simulation-based inquiry learning

AU - Mulder, Y.G.

AU - Lazonder, Adrianus W.

AU - de Jong, Ton

AU - Anjewierden, Anjo Allert

AU - Bollen, Lars

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Model progression denotes the organization of the inquiry learning process in successive phases of increasing complexity. This study investigated the effectiveness of model progression in general, and explored the added value of either broadening or narrowing students’ possibilities to change model progression phases. Results showed that high-school students in the ‘standard’ model progression condition (n = 19), who could enter subsequent phases at will, outperformed students from a control condition (n = 30) without model progression. The unrestricted condition (n = 22) had the additional option of returning to previous phases, whereas the restricted condition (n = 20) disallowed such downward progressions as well as upward progressions in case insufficient knowledge was acquired. Both variants were found to be more effective in terms of performance than the ‘standard’ form of model progression. However, as performance in all three model progression conditions was still rather weak, additional support is needed for students to reach full understanding of the learning content.

AB - Model progression denotes the organization of the inquiry learning process in successive phases of increasing complexity. This study investigated the effectiveness of model progression in general, and explored the added value of either broadening or narrowing students’ possibilities to change model progression phases. Results showed that high-school students in the ‘standard’ model progression condition (n = 19), who could enter subsequent phases at will, outperformed students from a control condition (n = 30) without model progression. The unrestricted condition (n = 22) had the additional option of returning to previous phases, whereas the restricted condition (n = 20) disallowed such downward progressions as well as upward progressions in case insufficient knowledge was acquired. Both variants were found to be more effective in terms of performance than the ‘standard’ form of model progression. However, as performance in all three model progression conditions was still rather weak, additional support is needed for students to reach full understanding of the learning content.

KW - METIS-291862

KW - IR-82935

U2 - 10.1007/s10956-011-9360-x

DO - 10.1007/s10956-011-9360-x

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 722

EP - 729

JO - Journal of science education and technology

JF - Journal of science education and technology

SN - 1059-0145

IS - 6

ER -