TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of a physics-based prognostic model with incomplete data: a rail wear case study
AU - Meghoe, Annemieke A.
AU - Loendersloot, Richard
AU - Tinga, Tiedo
N1 - Funding Information:
This research has been conducted within the Shift2Rail project In2Smart (European Union (EU) Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, grant agreement 730569). The authors would like to thank Strukton Rail for the participation in the project and acknowledge David Vermeij and Marc de Wolf from Strukton Rail and their team for the fruitful discussions on rail maintenance in practice and for providing actual track data. Furthermore, the authors would like to thank Maurice van Olderen from ProRail for providing the Quo Vadis data.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Prognostics and Health Management Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/3/11
Y1 - 2023/3/11
N2 - While the development of prognostic models is nowadays rather feasible, its implementation and validation can still create many challenges. One of the main challenges is the lack of high-quality input data like operational data, environmental data, maintenance data and the limited amount of degradation or failure data. The uncertainty in the output of the prognostic model needs to be quantified before it can be utilised for either model validation or actual maintenance decision support. This study, therefore, proposes a generic framework for prognostic model validation with limited data based on uncertainty propagation. This is realised by using sensitivity indices, correlation coefficients, Monte Carlo simulations and analytical approaches. For demonstration purposes, a rail wear prognostic model is used. The demonstration concludes that by following the generic framework, the prognostic model can be validated, and as a result, realistic maintenanceadvice can be given to rail infrastructure managers, even when limited data is available.
AB - While the development of prognostic models is nowadays rather feasible, its implementation and validation can still create many challenges. One of the main challenges is the lack of high-quality input data like operational data, environmental data, maintenance data and the limited amount of degradation or failure data. The uncertainty in the output of the prognostic model needs to be quantified before it can be utilised for either model validation or actual maintenance decision support. This study, therefore, proposes a generic framework for prognostic model validation with limited data based on uncertainty propagation. This is realised by using sensitivity indices, correlation coefficients, Monte Carlo simulations and analytical approaches. For demonstration purposes, a rail wear prognostic model is used. The demonstration concludes that by following the generic framework, the prognostic model can be validated, and as a result, realistic maintenanceadvice can be given to rail infrastructure managers, even when limited data is available.
KW - Prognostics
KW - Maintenance
KW - Rail wear
U2 - 10.36001/ijphm.2023.v14i1.3283
DO - 10.36001/ijphm.2023.v14i1.3283
M3 - Article
SN - 2153-2648
VL - 14
SP - 1
EP - 16
JO - International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
JF - International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
IS - 1
M1 - 3283
ER -