Validation of the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) in a self-directed instructional setting aimed at working with technology

Nicole Loorbach (Corresponding Author), Oscar Peters, Joyce Karreman, Michaël Steehouder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

164 Citations (Scopus)
13323 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The ARCS Model of Motivational Design has been used myriad times to design motivational instructions that focus on attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction in order to motivate students. The Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) is a 36-item situational measure of people's reactions to instructional materials in the light of the ARCS model. Although the IMMS has been used often, both as a pretest and a posttest tool serving as either a motivational needs assessment prior to instruction or a measure of people's reactions to instructional materials afterward, the IMMS so far has not been validated extensively, taking statistical and theoretical aspects of the survey into account. This paper describes such an extensive validation study, for which the IMMS was used in a self-directed instructional setting aimed at working with technology (a cellular telephone). Results of structural equation modeling show that the IMMS can be reduced to 12 items. This Reduced Instructional Materials Motivation Survey IMMS (RIMMS) is preferred over the original IMMS. The parsimonious RIMMS measures the four constructs attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction of the ARCS model well, and reflects its conditional nature.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)204-218
JournalBritish journal of educational technology
Volume46
Issue number1
Early online date17 Feb 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Keywords

  • 2019 OA procedure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) in a self-directed instructional setting aimed at working with technology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this