Values in socio-environmental modelling: Persuasion for action or excuse for inaction

A. Voinov, R. Seppelt, S. Reis, J.E.M.S. Nabel, S. Shokravi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Science in general and modelling in particular provide in-depth understanding of environmental processes and clearly demonstrate the present unsustainable use of resources on a global scale. The latest report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), for instance, shows that climate is changing and with a 95% certainty it is the humans have caused the change. The future climatic conditions are shown to be largely adversely affecting human wellbeing on this planet. Yet we see in numerous examples that societies are very slow in reacting to this rapid depletion of natural resources. What still seems lacking is the translation of scientific reports and the results of analysis and modelling into corrective actions. We argue that one of the reasons for this is the traditional workflow of environmental modelling, which starts with the purpose, the goal formulation, and ends with problem solutions or decision support tools. Instead, modelling, and applied science in general, has to enhance its scope beyond the problem solving stage, to do more on the problem definition and solution implementation phases. Modelling can be also used for identification of societal values and for setting purposes by appropriate communication of the modelling process and results. We believe this new approach for modelling can impact and bring the social values to the forefront of socio-environmental debate and hence turn scientific results into actions sooner rather than later. Instead of being separated from the modelling process, the translation of results should be an intrinsic part of it. We discuss several challenges for recent socio-environmental modelling and conclude with ten propositions that modellers and scientists in general can follow to improve their communication with the society and produce results that can be understood and used to improve awareness and education and spur action
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-212
Number of pages6
JournalEnvironmental modelling & software
Volume53
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

environmental modeling
Communication
Natural resources
Planets
Climate change
modeling
science in general
Education
communication
applied science
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
natural resource
planet
education
climate
resource

Keywords

  • METIS-300845
  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

Cite this

Voinov, A. ; Seppelt, R. ; Reis, S. ; Nabel, J.E.M.S. ; Shokravi, S. / Values in socio-environmental modelling: Persuasion for action or excuse for inaction. In: Environmental modelling & software. 2014 ; Vol. 53. pp. 207-212.
@article{75802d52a7e54607880c34367a32a0fb,
title = "Values in socio-environmental modelling: Persuasion for action or excuse for inaction",
abstract = "Science in general and modelling in particular provide in-depth understanding of environmental processes and clearly demonstrate the present unsustainable use of resources on a global scale. The latest report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), for instance, shows that climate is changing and with a 95{\%} certainty it is the humans have caused the change. The future climatic conditions are shown to be largely adversely affecting human wellbeing on this planet. Yet we see in numerous examples that societies are very slow in reacting to this rapid depletion of natural resources. What still seems lacking is the translation of scientific reports and the results of analysis and modelling into corrective actions. We argue that one of the reasons for this is the traditional workflow of environmental modelling, which starts with the purpose, the goal formulation, and ends with problem solutions or decision support tools. Instead, modelling, and applied science in general, has to enhance its scope beyond the problem solving stage, to do more on the problem definition and solution implementation phases. Modelling can be also used for identification of societal values and for setting purposes by appropriate communication of the modelling process and results. We believe this new approach for modelling can impact and bring the social values to the forefront of socio-environmental debate and hence turn scientific results into actions sooner rather than later. Instead of being separated from the modelling process, the translation of results should be an intrinsic part of it. We discuss several challenges for recent socio-environmental modelling and conclude with ten propositions that modellers and scientists in general can follow to improve their communication with the society and produce results that can be understood and used to improve awareness and education and spur action",
keywords = "METIS-300845, ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE",
author = "A. Voinov and R. Seppelt and S. Reis and J.E.M.S. Nabel and S. Shokravi",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.005",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "207--212",
journal = "Environmental modelling & software",
issn = "1364-8152",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Values in socio-environmental modelling: Persuasion for action or excuse for inaction. / Voinov, A.; Seppelt, R.; Reis, S.; Nabel, J.E.M.S.; Shokravi, S.

In: Environmental modelling & software, Vol. 53, 2014, p. 207-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Values in socio-environmental modelling: Persuasion for action or excuse for inaction

AU - Voinov, A.

AU - Seppelt, R.

AU - Reis, S.

AU - Nabel, J.E.M.S.

AU - Shokravi, S.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Science in general and modelling in particular provide in-depth understanding of environmental processes and clearly demonstrate the present unsustainable use of resources on a global scale. The latest report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), for instance, shows that climate is changing and with a 95% certainty it is the humans have caused the change. The future climatic conditions are shown to be largely adversely affecting human wellbeing on this planet. Yet we see in numerous examples that societies are very slow in reacting to this rapid depletion of natural resources. What still seems lacking is the translation of scientific reports and the results of analysis and modelling into corrective actions. We argue that one of the reasons for this is the traditional workflow of environmental modelling, which starts with the purpose, the goal formulation, and ends with problem solutions or decision support tools. Instead, modelling, and applied science in general, has to enhance its scope beyond the problem solving stage, to do more on the problem definition and solution implementation phases. Modelling can be also used for identification of societal values and for setting purposes by appropriate communication of the modelling process and results. We believe this new approach for modelling can impact and bring the social values to the forefront of socio-environmental debate and hence turn scientific results into actions sooner rather than later. Instead of being separated from the modelling process, the translation of results should be an intrinsic part of it. We discuss several challenges for recent socio-environmental modelling and conclude with ten propositions that modellers and scientists in general can follow to improve their communication with the society and produce results that can be understood and used to improve awareness and education and spur action

AB - Science in general and modelling in particular provide in-depth understanding of environmental processes and clearly demonstrate the present unsustainable use of resources on a global scale. The latest report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), for instance, shows that climate is changing and with a 95% certainty it is the humans have caused the change. The future climatic conditions are shown to be largely adversely affecting human wellbeing on this planet. Yet we see in numerous examples that societies are very slow in reacting to this rapid depletion of natural resources. What still seems lacking is the translation of scientific reports and the results of analysis and modelling into corrective actions. We argue that one of the reasons for this is the traditional workflow of environmental modelling, which starts with the purpose, the goal formulation, and ends with problem solutions or decision support tools. Instead, modelling, and applied science in general, has to enhance its scope beyond the problem solving stage, to do more on the problem definition and solution implementation phases. Modelling can be also used for identification of societal values and for setting purposes by appropriate communication of the modelling process and results. We believe this new approach for modelling can impact and bring the social values to the forefront of socio-environmental debate and hence turn scientific results into actions sooner rather than later. Instead of being separated from the modelling process, the translation of results should be an intrinsic part of it. We discuss several challenges for recent socio-environmental modelling and conclude with ten propositions that modellers and scientists in general can follow to improve their communication with the society and produce results that can be understood and used to improve awareness and education and spur action

KW - METIS-300845

KW - ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.005

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://webapps.itc.utwente.nl/library/2014/isi/voinov_val.pdf

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.005

DO - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.005

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 207

EP - 212

JO - Environmental modelling & software

JF - Environmental modelling & software

SN - 1364-8152

ER -