Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Varying severities of symptoms underline the relevance of personalized follow-up care in breast cancer survivors: latent class cluster analyses in a cross-sectional cohort

  • Kelly de Ligt*
  • , Belle H. De Rooij
  • , Iris Walraven
  • , M. Heins
  • , Janneke Verloop
  • , Sabine Siesling
  • , Joke C. Korevaar
  • , Lonneke V. v.d. Poll-Franse
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

174 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: Insights into the severity of co-existing symptoms can help in identifying breast cancer survivors in need of symptom management. We aimed to identify subgroups of breast cancer survivors based on patterns of symptom severity, and characteristics associated with these subgroups. Methods: We selected surgically treated stage I–III breast cancer survivors 1–5 years post-diagnosis from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (N = 876). We assessed experienced severity of fatigue, nausea, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite, constipation, diarrhea, and emotional and cognitive symptoms through the EORTC-QLQ-C30 Quality of Life Questionnaire on a scale of 0–100. We determined subgroups of survivors using latent class cluster analyses (LCA) based on severity of co-existing symptoms and compared their mean severity to the age-matched female reference population to interpret clinical relevance. We assessed subgroup characteristics by multinomial logistic regression analyses. Results: From 404 respondents (46%), three subgroups of survivors with distinct symptom severity were identified: low severity (n = 116, 28.7%), intermediate severity (n = 224, 55.4%), and high severity (n = 59, 14.6%). The low subgroup reported lower symptom severity than the general population; the intermediate subgroup reported a similar symptom severity, although scores for fatigue, insomnia, and cognitive symptoms were worse (small-medium clinical relevance). The high subgroup had worse symptom severity (medium-large clinical relevance). Compared to the intermediate subgroup, one (RRR: 2.75; CI: 1.22–6.19; p = 0.015) or more (RRR: 9.19; CI: 3.70–22.8; p = < 0.001) comorbidities were significantly associated with the high subgroup. We found no associated treatment characteristics. Conclusion: We identified distinct subgroups of breast cancer survivors based on symptom severity, underlining the relevance of further exploring personalized follow-up strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7873-7883
Number of pages11
JournalSupportive care in cancer
Volume30
Early online date21 Jun 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • 22/2 OA procedure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Varying severities of symptoms underline the relevance of personalized follow-up care in breast cancer survivors: latent class cluster analyses in a cross-sectional cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this