Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a viable option?

C.L. Meuwese; F.Z. Ramjankhan; A.O. Kraaijeveld; D.W. Donker

doi:10.1007/s12471-020-01372-7

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a viable option?

C.L. Meuwese^*, F.Z. Ramjankhan, A.O. Kraaijeveld, D.W. Donker

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has become a mainstay therapy for patients with severe cardiogenic shock [1]. Elective deployment of ECMO as prophylactic circulatory support to avoid refractory cardiac arrest or development of shock during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has not yet unequivocally been accepted as procedural routine in the catheterisation laboratory.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	136-138
Number of pages	3
Journal	Netherlands heart journal
Volume	28
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01372-7
Publication status	Published - 1 Mar 2020
Externally published	Yes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1007/s12471-020-01372-7Licence: CC BY

ArticleFinal published version, 156 KBLicence: CC BY

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079507128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

Cite this

@article{20ef23e7d19a4f54b6f7ba37288778b0,

title = "Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a viable option?",

abstract = "Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has become a mainstay therapy for patients with severe cardiogenic shock [1]. Elective deployment of ECMO as prophylactic circulatory support to avoid refractory cardiac arrest or development of shock during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has not yet unequivocally been accepted as procedural routine in the catheterisation laboratory.",

author = "C.L. Meuwese and F.Z. Ramjankhan and A.O. Kraaijeveld and D.W. Donker",

year = "2020",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s12471-020-01372-7",

language = "English",

volume = "28",

pages = "136--138",

journal = "Netherlands heart journal",

issn = "1568-5888",

publisher = "Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

T2 - a viable option?

AU - Meuwese, C.L.

AU - Ramjankhan, F.Z.

AU - Kraaijeveld, A.O.

AU - Donker, D.W.

PY - 2020/3/1

Y1 - 2020/3/1

N2 - Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has become a mainstay therapy for patients with severe cardiogenic shock [1]. Elective deployment of ECMO as prophylactic circulatory support to avoid refractory cardiac arrest or development of shock during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has not yet unequivocally been accepted as procedural routine in the catheterisation laboratory.

AB - Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has become a mainstay therapy for patients with severe cardiogenic shock [1]. Elective deployment of ECMO as prophylactic circulatory support to avoid refractory cardiac arrest or development of shock during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has not yet unequivocally been accepted as procedural routine in the catheterisation laboratory.

U2 - 10.1007/s12471-020-01372-7

DO - 10.1007/s12471-020-01372-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 32040720

SN - 1568-5888

VL - 28

SP - 136

EP - 138

JO - Netherlands heart journal

JF - Netherlands heart journal

IS - 3

ER -

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a viable option?

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this