Verifiability of electronic voting: between confidence and trust

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

When computing scientists speak about electronic voting, it is often in terms of trust. But there are two contradictory statements. First, they argue that it should not be necessary to trust e-voting systems, which would be the case if they are provably secure. Second, for an e-voting system to be successful, the public must trust it. When we unravel the confusing concept of trust, we find that there are two quite different meanings: relying on something that one does not understand and does not really choose (confidence), or relying on something that one does understand and has consciously chosen (trust). The distinction is due to the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann. In this contribution, we analyse how this distinction can help in analysing the controversies around electronic voting. It is argued that because of the controversy, paper voting and e-voting now tend to be seen as radically different alternatives, which require comparison and a conscious decision. Trustworthiness, as opposed to reliability only, has thereby become a major requirement of electronic voting systems, leading to the implementation of various verification options. This increasingly applies to other systems that handle sensitive data as well. We will discuss the various types of verifiability in electronic voting systems, and how these can contribute to trustworthiness of data processing in general.
LanguageUndefined
Title of host publicationData Protection in a Profiled World
EditorsSerge Gutwirth, Yves Poullet, Paul De Hert
Place of PublicationDordrecht
PublisherSpringer
Pages157-175
Number of pages19
ISBN (Print)978-90-481-8864-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Publication series

Name
PublisherSpringer

Keywords

  • IR-72498
  • SCS-Cybersecurity
  • EWI-18267
  • METIS-275628

Cite this

Pieters, W. (2010). Verifiability of electronic voting: between confidence and trust. In S. Gutwirth, Y. Poullet, & P. De Hert (Eds.), Data Protection in a Profiled World (pp. 157-175). [10.1007/978-90-481-8865-9_9] Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8865-9_9
Pieters, Wolter. / Verifiability of electronic voting: between confidence and trust. Data Protection in a Profiled World. editor / Serge Gutwirth ; Yves Poullet ; Paul De Hert. Dordrecht : Springer, 2010. pp. 157-175
@inbook{ab1522526dbd4cb7af034e2ee24fb07b,
title = "Verifiability of electronic voting: between confidence and trust",
abstract = "When computing scientists speak about electronic voting, it is often in terms of trust. But there are two contradictory statements. First, they argue that it should not be necessary to trust e-voting systems, which would be the case if they are provably secure. Second, for an e-voting system to be successful, the public must trust it. When we unravel the confusing concept of trust, we find that there are two quite different meanings: relying on something that one does not understand and does not really choose (confidence), or relying on something that one does understand and has consciously chosen (trust). The distinction is due to the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann. In this contribution, we analyse how this distinction can help in analysing the controversies around electronic voting. It is argued that because of the controversy, paper voting and e-voting now tend to be seen as radically different alternatives, which require comparison and a conscious decision. Trustworthiness, as opposed to reliability only, has thereby become a major requirement of electronic voting systems, leading to the implementation of various verification options. This increasingly applies to other systems that handle sensitive data as well. We will discuss the various types of verifiability in electronic voting systems, and how these can contribute to trustworthiness of data processing in general.",
keywords = "IR-72498, SCS-Cybersecurity, EWI-18267, METIS-275628",
author = "Wolter Pieters",
note = "10.1007/978-90-481-8865-9_9",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1007/978-90-481-8865-9_9",
language = "Undefined",
isbn = "978-90-481-8864-2",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "157--175",
editor = "Serge Gutwirth and Yves Poullet and {De Hert}, Paul",
booktitle = "Data Protection in a Profiled World",

}

Pieters, W 2010, Verifiability of electronic voting: between confidence and trust. in S Gutwirth, Y Poullet & P De Hert (eds), Data Protection in a Profiled World., 10.1007/978-90-481-8865-9_9, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 157-175. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8865-9_9

Verifiability of electronic voting: between confidence and trust. / Pieters, Wolter.

Data Protection in a Profiled World. ed. / Serge Gutwirth; Yves Poullet; Paul De Hert. Dordrecht : Springer, 2010. p. 157-175 10.1007/978-90-481-8865-9_9.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Verifiability of electronic voting: between confidence and trust

AU - Pieters,Wolter

N1 - 10.1007/978-90-481-8865-9_9

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - When computing scientists speak about electronic voting, it is often in terms of trust. But there are two contradictory statements. First, they argue that it should not be necessary to trust e-voting systems, which would be the case if they are provably secure. Second, for an e-voting system to be successful, the public must trust it. When we unravel the confusing concept of trust, we find that there are two quite different meanings: relying on something that one does not understand and does not really choose (confidence), or relying on something that one does understand and has consciously chosen (trust). The distinction is due to the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann. In this contribution, we analyse how this distinction can help in analysing the controversies around electronic voting. It is argued that because of the controversy, paper voting and e-voting now tend to be seen as radically different alternatives, which require comparison and a conscious decision. Trustworthiness, as opposed to reliability only, has thereby become a major requirement of electronic voting systems, leading to the implementation of various verification options. This increasingly applies to other systems that handle sensitive data as well. We will discuss the various types of verifiability in electronic voting systems, and how these can contribute to trustworthiness of data processing in general.

AB - When computing scientists speak about electronic voting, it is often in terms of trust. But there are two contradictory statements. First, they argue that it should not be necessary to trust e-voting systems, which would be the case if they are provably secure. Second, for an e-voting system to be successful, the public must trust it. When we unravel the confusing concept of trust, we find that there are two quite different meanings: relying on something that one does not understand and does not really choose (confidence), or relying on something that one does understand and has consciously chosen (trust). The distinction is due to the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann. In this contribution, we analyse how this distinction can help in analysing the controversies around electronic voting. It is argued that because of the controversy, paper voting and e-voting now tend to be seen as radically different alternatives, which require comparison and a conscious decision. Trustworthiness, as opposed to reliability only, has thereby become a major requirement of electronic voting systems, leading to the implementation of various verification options. This increasingly applies to other systems that handle sensitive data as well. We will discuss the various types of verifiability in electronic voting systems, and how these can contribute to trustworthiness of data processing in general.

KW - IR-72498

KW - SCS-Cybersecurity

KW - EWI-18267

KW - METIS-275628

U2 - 10.1007/978-90-481-8865-9_9

DO - 10.1007/978-90-481-8865-9_9

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-90-481-8864-2

SP - 157

EP - 175

BT - Data Protection in a Profiled World

PB - Springer

CY - Dordrecht

ER -

Pieters W. Verifiability of electronic voting: between confidence and trust. In Gutwirth S, Poullet Y, De Hert P, editors, Data Protection in a Profiled World. Dordrecht: Springer. 2010. p. 157-175. 10.1007/978-90-481-8865-9_9. Available from, DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8865-9_9