Victim–Offender Mediation and Reduced Reoffending: Gauging the Self-Selection Bias: Gauging the Self-Selection Bias

Jiska Jonas-van Dijk, Sven Zebel, Jacques Claessen, Hans Nelen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Previous research suggests that participation in victim–offender mediation (VOM) can lower the risk of reoffending. However, no randomized controlled trials have been done to examine this effect of VOM. Given that participation in VOM is voluntary, previous studies likely suffer from self-selection bias. To address this bias, we compared reoffending rates of three different offender groups: offenders who participated in VOM; offenders who were willing to participate, but whose counterpart declined VOM; and offenders unwilling to participate (total N = 1,275). Results replicated that participation in VOM predicts lower reoffending rates and suggested that this effect is not solely due to a self-selection bias. Suggestions are made for future research to examine why VOM causes lower reoffending rates.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCrime and Delinquency
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print/First online - 10 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Selection Bias
mediation
trend
offender
participation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Research
cause

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D

Cite this

@article{334c31f18f294b779cacb75279e907d0,
title = "Victim–Offender Mediation and Reduced Reoffending: Gauging the Self-Selection Bias: Gauging the Self-Selection Bias",
abstract = "Previous research suggests that participation in victim–offender mediation (VOM) can lower the risk of reoffending. However, no randomized controlled trials have been done to examine this effect of VOM. Given that participation in VOM is voluntary, previous studies likely suffer from self-selection bias. To address this bias, we compared reoffending rates of three different offender groups: offenders who participated in VOM; offenders who were willing to participate, but whose counterpart declined VOM; and offenders unwilling to participate (total N = 1,275). Results replicated that participation in VOM predicts lower reoffending rates and suggested that this effect is not solely due to a self-selection bias. Suggestions are made for future research to examine why VOM causes lower reoffending rates.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D",
author = "{Jonas-van Dijk}, Jiska and Sven Zebel and Jacques Claessen and Hans Nelen",
note = "Sage deal",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1177/0011128719854348",
language = "English",
journal = "Crime and Delinquency",
issn = "0011-1287",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

Victim–Offender Mediation and Reduced Reoffending: Gauging the Self-Selection Bias : Gauging the Self-Selection Bias . / Jonas-van Dijk, Jiska ; Zebel, Sven ; Claessen, Jacques; Nelen, Hans.

In: Crime and Delinquency, 10.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Victim–Offender Mediation and Reduced Reoffending: Gauging the Self-Selection Bias

T2 - Gauging the Self-Selection Bias

AU - Jonas-van Dijk, Jiska

AU - Zebel, Sven

AU - Claessen, Jacques

AU - Nelen, Hans

N1 - Sage deal

PY - 2019/6/10

Y1 - 2019/6/10

N2 - Previous research suggests that participation in victim–offender mediation (VOM) can lower the risk of reoffending. However, no randomized controlled trials have been done to examine this effect of VOM. Given that participation in VOM is voluntary, previous studies likely suffer from self-selection bias. To address this bias, we compared reoffending rates of three different offender groups: offenders who participated in VOM; offenders who were willing to participate, but whose counterpart declined VOM; and offenders unwilling to participate (total N = 1,275). Results replicated that participation in VOM predicts lower reoffending rates and suggested that this effect is not solely due to a self-selection bias. Suggestions are made for future research to examine why VOM causes lower reoffending rates.

AB - Previous research suggests that participation in victim–offender mediation (VOM) can lower the risk of reoffending. However, no randomized controlled trials have been done to examine this effect of VOM. Given that participation in VOM is voluntary, previous studies likely suffer from self-selection bias. To address this bias, we compared reoffending rates of three different offender groups: offenders who participated in VOM; offenders who were willing to participate, but whose counterpart declined VOM; and offenders unwilling to participate (total N = 1,275). Results replicated that participation in VOM predicts lower reoffending rates and suggested that this effect is not solely due to a self-selection bias. Suggestions are made for future research to examine why VOM causes lower reoffending rates.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

U2 - 10.1177/0011128719854348

DO - 10.1177/0011128719854348

M3 - Article

JO - Crime and Delinquency

JF - Crime and Delinquency

SN - 0011-1287

ER -