TY - JOUR
T1 - Warming up cool cooperators
AU - Ferguson, Eamonn
AU - Lawrence, Claire
AU - Bowen, Sarah
AU - Gemelli, Carley N.
AU - Rozsa, Amy
AU - Niekrasz, Konrad
AU - van Dongen, Anne
AU - Williams, Lisa A.
AU - Thijsen, Amanda
AU - Guerin, Nicola
AU - Masser, Barbara
AU - Davison, Tanya E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - Explaining why someone repeats high-cost cooperation towards non-reciprocating strangers is difficult. Warm glow offers an explanation. We argue that warm glow, as a mechanism to sustain long-term cooperation, cools off over time but can be warmed up with a simple intervention message. We tested our predictions in the context of repeat voluntary blood donation (high-cost helping of a non-reciprocating stranger) across 6 studies: a field-based experiment (n = 5,821) comparing warm-glow and impure-altruism messages; an implementation study comparing a 3-yr pre-implementation period among all first-time donors in Australia (N = 270,353) with a 2-yr post-implementation period (N = 170, 317); and 4 studies (n = 716, 1,124, 932, 1,592) exploring mechanisms. We show that there are relatively warm and cool cooperators, not cooling cooperators. Cooperation among cool cooperators is enhanced by a warm-glow-plus-identity message. Furthermore, the behavioural facilitation of future cooperation, by booking an appointment, is associated with being a warm cooperator. Societal implications are discussed.
AB - Explaining why someone repeats high-cost cooperation towards non-reciprocating strangers is difficult. Warm glow offers an explanation. We argue that warm glow, as a mechanism to sustain long-term cooperation, cools off over time but can be warmed up with a simple intervention message. We tested our predictions in the context of repeat voluntary blood donation (high-cost helping of a non-reciprocating stranger) across 6 studies: a field-based experiment (n = 5,821) comparing warm-glow and impure-altruism messages; an implementation study comparing a 3-yr pre-implementation period among all first-time donors in Australia (N = 270,353) with a 2-yr post-implementation period (N = 170, 317); and 4 studies (n = 716, 1,124, 932, 1,592) exploring mechanisms. We show that there are relatively warm and cool cooperators, not cooling cooperators. Cooperation among cool cooperators is enhanced by a warm-glow-plus-identity message. Furthermore, the behavioural facilitation of future cooperation, by booking an appointment, is associated with being a warm cooperator. Societal implications are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171263993&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41562-023-01687-6
DO - 10.1038/s41562-023-01687-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 37710031
AN - SCOPUS:85171263993
SN - 2397-3374
VL - 7
SP - 1917
EP - 1932
JO - Nature Human Behaviour
JF - Nature Human Behaviour
IS - 11
ER -