TY - JOUR
T1 - Water as a human right, water as a commodity
T2 - can SDG6 be a compromise?
AU - Ibrahim, Imad Antoine
N1 - Funding Information:
the city to replace the city's thousands of lead pipes with funding from the state, and guaranteeing further funding for comprehensive tap water testing, a faucet filter installation and education program, free bottled water through the following summer, and continued health programs to help residents deal with the residual effects of Flint's tainted water.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The debate over whether water must be considered a human right or a commodity has been ongoing for a few decades. It has led to a conflict between supporters of a human rights approach to water and those who advocate an economic approach. The existing research either legitimizes or criticizes these approaches on the basis of several lessons that are vital to ensuring water access. These lessons are either not mentioned at all when the debate is taking place or are stated independently by the different parties to support their claims. For this reason, this article seeks to answer the following questions. First, what is the relevance of these lessons to ensuring water access? Second, can a compromise be found between viewing water as a human right or a commodity? The author demonstrates that these lessons play a very important role when they are addressed simultaneously because they are interconnected. Considering them at once is vital to addressing the question of water access on a case-by-case basis, with two case studies discussed here. The author also highlights how the use of Sustainable Development Goal 6 at the domestic level is a more practical approach to ensuring water access.
AB - The debate over whether water must be considered a human right or a commodity has been ongoing for a few decades. It has led to a conflict between supporters of a human rights approach to water and those who advocate an economic approach. The existing research either legitimizes or criticizes these approaches on the basis of several lessons that are vital to ensuring water access. These lessons are either not mentioned at all when the debate is taking place or are stated independently by the different parties to support their claims. For this reason, this article seeks to answer the following questions. First, what is the relevance of these lessons to ensuring water access? Second, can a compromise be found between viewing water as a human right or a commodity? The author demonstrates that these lessons play a very important role when they are addressed simultaneously because they are interconnected. Considering them at once is vital to addressing the question of water access on a case-by-case basis, with two case studies discussed here. The author also highlights how the use of Sustainable Development Goal 6 at the domestic level is a more practical approach to ensuring water access.
KW - Commodity
KW - Effective regulations
KW - Human rights
KW - SDG6
KW - Unique nature
KW - Water
KW - n/a OA procedure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110302942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13642987.2021.1945582
DO - 10.1080/13642987.2021.1945582
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85110302942
SN - 1364-2987
VL - 26
SP - 469
EP - 493
JO - International Journal of Human Rights
JF - International Journal of Human Rights
IS - 3
ER -