What Controls Endothelial Sprouting? Interstitial Flow vs. Shear Stress

N. Salehi Nik, Sayedeh Sana Sayedipour (Contributor), Prasanna Padmanaban (Contributor), F. Stein (Contributor), J. Rouwkema (Contributor)

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractAcademic

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: During angiogenesis, endothelial cell (EC) sprouting occurs when select ECs lining a vessel are exposed to stimulatory factors. Growth factor gradient has been proved to stimulate angiogenesis. However, the effect of shear stress on cell sprouting has been controversial [1-2]. Since certain level of media perfusion is required to support cell viability as well as to maintain the stability of the newly formed vascular network, it is necessary to fine-tune shear stress in engineered tissues. In the present study, we investigated the effect of different amounts of shear stress and interstitial flow on EC sprouting with the aim of finding a new approach to control vascular formation in thick engineered tissues. Methods: To determine how different ranges of interstitial flow and shear stress modulate sprouting, we developed a microfluidic platform that contains a crinkle line with different angles (Channel 1), a straight line (Channel 2) and a hydrogel channel in between. Both channels 1 and 2 were lined with a monolayer of ECs. Mural cells and ECs were mixed with the hydrogel and filled in the channel between the two EC lined channels. To assess the effect of shear stress on cell sprouting, the pressure drop in different parts of the channel 1 was kept constant. To apply interstitial flow in different directions, positive or negative pressure difference was considered between two channels. Shear stress and interstitial flow profiles were calculated using COMSOL simulation. Results & Discussion: Biological self-assembling of ECs resulted in tube formation within the hydrogel after one week. ECs lined the channels 1 and 2 started to sprout and connect to the capillary bed based on the amount of shear stress they experienced. High amounts of shear stress restricted angiogenesis. In contrast, low amount of shear stress was suitable to initiate and support ECs sprouting. Interstitial flow was required to direct ECs connection to the capillary bed within the hydrogel, and making perfusable vascular networks. Conclusions: Using a microfluidic platform, we found that biomechanical forces at special ranges direct sprout formation and can be used to control vascularization within engineered tissues.
Original languageEnglish
Pages1213-1213
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 30 May 2019
EventTERMIS European Chapter Meeting 2019: Tissue Engineering Therapies: From Concept to Clinical Translation & Commercialisation - Rodos Palace, Rhodes, Greece
Duration: 27 May 201931 May 2019
https://www.termis.org/eu2019/

Conference

ConferenceTERMIS European Chapter Meeting 2019
Abbreviated titleTERMIS EU 2019
CountryGreece
CityRhodes
Period27/05/1931/05/19
Internet address

Fingerprint

Hydrogel
Blood Vessels
Microfluidics
Endothelial Cells
Pressure
Cell Survival
Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
Perfusion

Cite this

Salehi Nik, N., Sayedipour, S. S., Padmanaban, P., Stein, F., & Rouwkema, J. (2019). What Controls Endothelial Sprouting? Interstitial Flow vs. Shear Stress. 1213-1213. Abstract from TERMIS European Chapter Meeting 2019, Rhodes, Greece.
Salehi Nik, N. ; Sayedipour, Sayedeh Sana ; Padmanaban, Prasanna ; Stein, F. ; Rouwkema, J. / What Controls Endothelial Sprouting? Interstitial Flow vs. Shear Stress. Abstract from TERMIS European Chapter Meeting 2019, Rhodes, Greece.1 p.
@conference{afd3b2eb1b05450b9e100450daffb9d0,
title = "What Controls Endothelial Sprouting?: Interstitial Flow vs. Shear Stress",
abstract = "Introduction: During angiogenesis, endothelial cell (EC) sprouting occurs when select ECs lining a vessel are exposed to stimulatory factors. Growth factor gradient has been proved to stimulate angiogenesis. However, the effect of shear stress on cell sprouting has been controversial [1-2]. Since certain level of media perfusion is required to support cell viability as well as to maintain the stability of the newly formed vascular network, it is necessary to fine-tune shear stress in engineered tissues. In the present study, we investigated the effect of different amounts of shear stress and interstitial flow on EC sprouting with the aim of finding a new approach to control vascular formation in thick engineered tissues. Methods: To determine how different ranges of interstitial flow and shear stress modulate sprouting, we developed a microfluidic platform that contains a crinkle line with different angles (Channel 1), a straight line (Channel 2) and a hydrogel channel in between. Both channels 1 and 2 were lined with a monolayer of ECs. Mural cells and ECs were mixed with the hydrogel and filled in the channel between the two EC lined channels. To assess the effect of shear stress on cell sprouting, the pressure drop in different parts of the channel 1 was kept constant. To apply interstitial flow in different directions, positive or negative pressure difference was considered between two channels. Shear stress and interstitial flow profiles were calculated using COMSOL simulation. Results & Discussion: Biological self-assembling of ECs resulted in tube formation within the hydrogel after one week. ECs lined the channels 1 and 2 started to sprout and connect to the capillary bed based on the amount of shear stress they experienced. High amounts of shear stress restricted angiogenesis. In contrast, low amount of shear stress was suitable to initiate and support ECs sprouting. Interstitial flow was required to direct ECs connection to the capillary bed within the hydrogel, and making perfusable vascular networks. Conclusions: Using a microfluidic platform, we found that biomechanical forces at special ranges direct sprout formation and can be used to control vascularization within engineered tissues.",
author = "{Salehi Nik}, N. and Sayedipour, {Sayedeh Sana} and Prasanna Padmanaban and F. Stein and J. Rouwkema",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "30",
language = "English",
pages = "1213--1213",
note = "TERMIS European Chapter Meeting 2019 : Tissue Engineering Therapies: From Concept to Clinical Translation & Commercialisation, TERMIS EU 2019 ; Conference date: 27-05-2019 Through 31-05-2019",
url = "https://www.termis.org/eu2019/",

}

Salehi Nik, N, Sayedipour, SS, Padmanaban, P, Stein, F & Rouwkema, J 2019, 'What Controls Endothelial Sprouting? Interstitial Flow vs. Shear Stress' TERMIS European Chapter Meeting 2019, Rhodes, Greece, 27/05/19 - 31/05/19, pp. 1213-1213.

What Controls Endothelial Sprouting? Interstitial Flow vs. Shear Stress. / Salehi Nik, N.; Sayedipour, Sayedeh Sana (Contributor); Padmanaban, Prasanna (Contributor); Stein, F. (Contributor); Rouwkema, J. (Contributor).

2019. 1213-1213 Abstract from TERMIS European Chapter Meeting 2019, Rhodes, Greece.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractAcademic

TY - CONF

T1 - What Controls Endothelial Sprouting?

T2 - Interstitial Flow vs. Shear Stress

AU - Salehi Nik, N.

A2 - Sayedipour, Sayedeh Sana

A2 - Padmanaban, Prasanna

A2 - Stein, F.

A2 - Rouwkema, J.

PY - 2019/5/30

Y1 - 2019/5/30

N2 - Introduction: During angiogenesis, endothelial cell (EC) sprouting occurs when select ECs lining a vessel are exposed to stimulatory factors. Growth factor gradient has been proved to stimulate angiogenesis. However, the effect of shear stress on cell sprouting has been controversial [1-2]. Since certain level of media perfusion is required to support cell viability as well as to maintain the stability of the newly formed vascular network, it is necessary to fine-tune shear stress in engineered tissues. In the present study, we investigated the effect of different amounts of shear stress and interstitial flow on EC sprouting with the aim of finding a new approach to control vascular formation in thick engineered tissues. Methods: To determine how different ranges of interstitial flow and shear stress modulate sprouting, we developed a microfluidic platform that contains a crinkle line with different angles (Channel 1), a straight line (Channel 2) and a hydrogel channel in between. Both channels 1 and 2 were lined with a monolayer of ECs. Mural cells and ECs were mixed with the hydrogel and filled in the channel between the two EC lined channels. To assess the effect of shear stress on cell sprouting, the pressure drop in different parts of the channel 1 was kept constant. To apply interstitial flow in different directions, positive or negative pressure difference was considered between two channels. Shear stress and interstitial flow profiles were calculated using COMSOL simulation. Results & Discussion: Biological self-assembling of ECs resulted in tube formation within the hydrogel after one week. ECs lined the channels 1 and 2 started to sprout and connect to the capillary bed based on the amount of shear stress they experienced. High amounts of shear stress restricted angiogenesis. In contrast, low amount of shear stress was suitable to initiate and support ECs sprouting. Interstitial flow was required to direct ECs connection to the capillary bed within the hydrogel, and making perfusable vascular networks. Conclusions: Using a microfluidic platform, we found that biomechanical forces at special ranges direct sprout formation and can be used to control vascularization within engineered tissues.

AB - Introduction: During angiogenesis, endothelial cell (EC) sprouting occurs when select ECs lining a vessel are exposed to stimulatory factors. Growth factor gradient has been proved to stimulate angiogenesis. However, the effect of shear stress on cell sprouting has been controversial [1-2]. Since certain level of media perfusion is required to support cell viability as well as to maintain the stability of the newly formed vascular network, it is necessary to fine-tune shear stress in engineered tissues. In the present study, we investigated the effect of different amounts of shear stress and interstitial flow on EC sprouting with the aim of finding a new approach to control vascular formation in thick engineered tissues. Methods: To determine how different ranges of interstitial flow and shear stress modulate sprouting, we developed a microfluidic platform that contains a crinkle line with different angles (Channel 1), a straight line (Channel 2) and a hydrogel channel in between. Both channels 1 and 2 were lined with a monolayer of ECs. Mural cells and ECs were mixed with the hydrogel and filled in the channel between the two EC lined channels. To assess the effect of shear stress on cell sprouting, the pressure drop in different parts of the channel 1 was kept constant. To apply interstitial flow in different directions, positive or negative pressure difference was considered between two channels. Shear stress and interstitial flow profiles were calculated using COMSOL simulation. Results & Discussion: Biological self-assembling of ECs resulted in tube formation within the hydrogel after one week. ECs lined the channels 1 and 2 started to sprout and connect to the capillary bed based on the amount of shear stress they experienced. High amounts of shear stress restricted angiogenesis. In contrast, low amount of shear stress was suitable to initiate and support ECs sprouting. Interstitial flow was required to direct ECs connection to the capillary bed within the hydrogel, and making perfusable vascular networks. Conclusions: Using a microfluidic platform, we found that biomechanical forces at special ranges direct sprout formation and can be used to control vascularization within engineered tissues.

M3 - Abstract

SP - 1213

EP - 1213

ER -

Salehi Nik N, Sayedipour SS, Padmanaban P, Stein F, Rouwkema J. What Controls Endothelial Sprouting? Interstitial Flow vs. Shear Stress. 2019. Abstract from TERMIS European Chapter Meeting 2019, Rhodes, Greece.