What Factors are Associated with Flourishing? Results from a Large Representative National Sample

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)
273 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Flourishing is the ultimate end-state in psychology and a key-concept in the field of positive psychology research. Flourishers are those individuals with both high levels of hedonic well-being and eudaimonic well-being. Although many researchers have focused on one or another of these domains, only a few have investigated the comprehensive state of flourishing. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of flourishing and its association with socio-demographics, personality traits and situational factors. This study used data from the second wave of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2), a national representative sample of adults in The Netherlands (n = 5303; 2010–2012). Findings were compared to having either high hedonic well-being or high eudaimonic well-being. Results showed that 37 % of the respondents were flourishers, mainly characterized by high levels of conscientiousness and extraversion and low levels of neuroticism. The situational factors of social support and positive life-events were significantly associated with flourishing when the analysis was controlled for socio-demographics and personality traits. Flourishing was most distinct from high hedonic well-being and showed parallelism with high eudaimonic well-being. More research is needed to establish a preferred flourishing instrument with validated cut-off points for flourishing and to understand the processes of situational factors that may underlie the promotion of flourishing. We recommend longitudinal designs and experience sampling studies to investigate the unique and modifiable predictors of flourishing. In addition, future research should include intervention studies that examine through which hedonic and eudaimonic pathways flourishing can be achieved
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1351-1370
JournalJournal of happiness studies
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

well-being
personality traits
Netherlands
psychology
neuroticism
social support
incidence
promotion
mental health
event
experience

Keywords

  • METIS-310742
  • IR-96116

Cite this

@article{242e6876d1c4477e968a74a4d5ce58f7,
title = "What Factors are Associated with Flourishing? Results from a Large Representative National Sample",
abstract = "Flourishing is the ultimate end-state in psychology and a key-concept in the field of positive psychology research. Flourishers are those individuals with both high levels of hedonic well-being and eudaimonic well-being. Although many researchers have focused on one or another of these domains, only a few have investigated the comprehensive state of flourishing. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of flourishing and its association with socio-demographics, personality traits and situational factors. This study used data from the second wave of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2), a national representative sample of adults in The Netherlands (n = 5303; 2010–2012). Findings were compared to having either high hedonic well-being or high eudaimonic well-being. Results showed that 37 {\%} of the respondents were flourishers, mainly characterized by high levels of conscientiousness and extraversion and low levels of neuroticism. The situational factors of social support and positive life-events were significantly associated with flourishing when the analysis was controlled for socio-demographics and personality traits. Flourishing was most distinct from high hedonic well-being and showed parallelism with high eudaimonic well-being. More research is needed to establish a preferred flourishing instrument with validated cut-off points for flourishing and to understand the processes of situational factors that may underlie the promotion of flourishing. We recommend longitudinal designs and experience sampling studies to investigate the unique and modifiable predictors of flourishing. In addition, future research should include intervention studies that examine through which hedonic and eudaimonic pathways flourishing can be achieved",
keywords = "METIS-310742, IR-96116",
author = "Marijke Schotanus-Dijkstra and Pieterse, {Marcel E.} and Drossaert, {Constance H.C.} and Westerhof, {Gerben Johan} and {de Graaf}, R. and {ten Have}, M. and J.A. Walburg and Bohlmeijer, {Ernst Thomas}",
note = "Open access",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s10902-015-9647-3",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "1351--1370",
journal = "Journal of happiness studies",
issn = "1389-4978",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

What Factors are Associated with Flourishing? Results from a Large Representative National Sample. / Schotanus-Dijkstra, Marijke; Pieterse, Marcel E.; Drossaert, Constance H.C.; Westerhof, Gerben Johan; de Graaf, R.; ten Have, M.; Walburg, J.A.; Bohlmeijer, Ernst Thomas.

In: Journal of happiness studies, Vol. 17, No. 4, 11.06.2016, p. 1351-1370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Factors are Associated with Flourishing? Results from a Large Representative National Sample

AU - Schotanus-Dijkstra, Marijke

AU - Pieterse, Marcel E.

AU - Drossaert, Constance H.C.

AU - Westerhof, Gerben Johan

AU - de Graaf, R.

AU - ten Have, M.

AU - Walburg, J.A.

AU - Bohlmeijer, Ernst Thomas

N1 - Open access

PY - 2016/6/11

Y1 - 2016/6/11

N2 - Flourishing is the ultimate end-state in psychology and a key-concept in the field of positive psychology research. Flourishers are those individuals with both high levels of hedonic well-being and eudaimonic well-being. Although many researchers have focused on one or another of these domains, only a few have investigated the comprehensive state of flourishing. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of flourishing and its association with socio-demographics, personality traits and situational factors. This study used data from the second wave of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2), a national representative sample of adults in The Netherlands (n = 5303; 2010–2012). Findings were compared to having either high hedonic well-being or high eudaimonic well-being. Results showed that 37 % of the respondents were flourishers, mainly characterized by high levels of conscientiousness and extraversion and low levels of neuroticism. The situational factors of social support and positive life-events were significantly associated with flourishing when the analysis was controlled for socio-demographics and personality traits. Flourishing was most distinct from high hedonic well-being and showed parallelism with high eudaimonic well-being. More research is needed to establish a preferred flourishing instrument with validated cut-off points for flourishing and to understand the processes of situational factors that may underlie the promotion of flourishing. We recommend longitudinal designs and experience sampling studies to investigate the unique and modifiable predictors of flourishing. In addition, future research should include intervention studies that examine through which hedonic and eudaimonic pathways flourishing can be achieved

AB - Flourishing is the ultimate end-state in psychology and a key-concept in the field of positive psychology research. Flourishers are those individuals with both high levels of hedonic well-being and eudaimonic well-being. Although many researchers have focused on one or another of these domains, only a few have investigated the comprehensive state of flourishing. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of flourishing and its association with socio-demographics, personality traits and situational factors. This study used data from the second wave of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2), a national representative sample of adults in The Netherlands (n = 5303; 2010–2012). Findings were compared to having either high hedonic well-being or high eudaimonic well-being. Results showed that 37 % of the respondents were flourishers, mainly characterized by high levels of conscientiousness and extraversion and low levels of neuroticism. The situational factors of social support and positive life-events were significantly associated with flourishing when the analysis was controlled for socio-demographics and personality traits. Flourishing was most distinct from high hedonic well-being and showed parallelism with high eudaimonic well-being. More research is needed to establish a preferred flourishing instrument with validated cut-off points for flourishing and to understand the processes of situational factors that may underlie the promotion of flourishing. We recommend longitudinal designs and experience sampling studies to investigate the unique and modifiable predictors of flourishing. In addition, future research should include intervention studies that examine through which hedonic and eudaimonic pathways flourishing can be achieved

KW - METIS-310742

KW - IR-96116

U2 - 10.1007/s10902-015-9647-3

DO - 10.1007/s10902-015-9647-3

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 1351

EP - 1370

JO - Journal of happiness studies

JF - Journal of happiness studies

SN - 1389-4978

IS - 4

ER -