Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | - |
| Number of pages | 35 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Publication series
| Name | CHEPS working paper series |
|---|---|
| No. | 01 |
| Volume | 2015 |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 2589-9716 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- IR-97167
- METIS-320807
Cite this
}
What makes the difference? Analysing the regional component of the influence of university's structural configuration on its performance. / Sánchez-Barrioluengo, Mabel; Benneworth, Paul Stephen.
2015. p. - (CHEPS working paper series; Vol. 2015, No. 01).Research output: Working paper › Professional
TY - UNPB
T1 - What makes the difference? Analysing the regional component of the influence of university's structural configuration on its performance
AU - Sánchez-Barrioluengo, Mabel
AU - Benneworth, Paul Stephen
N1 - CHEPS working paper 2015/01
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - There is an increasing interest in the analysis of how universities should maximise their specific regional contribution alongside their traditional teaching and research goals. However, due to the institutional heterogeneity it is necessary to understand the process by which universities create regional benefits, specifically on the creation of third mission outputs, and the extent to which internal institutional configuration affects the production of these benefits. To cover this gap, this study focus on the UK Higher Education sector and investigates the role played by four elements of the universities’ structural configuration, namely steering core, administrative machinery, internal coupling and academic heartland, affect institutional performance in two different university models: the entrepreneurial university and the regional innovation system university model
AB - There is an increasing interest in the analysis of how universities should maximise their specific regional contribution alongside their traditional teaching and research goals. However, due to the institutional heterogeneity it is necessary to understand the process by which universities create regional benefits, specifically on the creation of third mission outputs, and the extent to which internal institutional configuration affects the production of these benefits. To cover this gap, this study focus on the UK Higher Education sector and investigates the role played by four elements of the universities’ structural configuration, namely steering core, administrative machinery, internal coupling and academic heartland, affect institutional performance in two different university models: the entrepreneurial university and the regional innovation system university model
KW - IR-97167
KW - METIS-320807
U2 - 10.3990/4.2589-9716.2015.1
DO - 10.3990/4.2589-9716.2015.1
M3 - Working paper
T3 - CHEPS working paper series
SP - -
BT - What makes the difference? Analysing the regional component of the influence of university's structural configuration on its performance
ER -