TY - JOUR
T1 - What Next for the Science of Patient Preference? Interoperability, Standardization, and Transferability
AU - Marsh, Kevin
AU - Sepulveda, Juan Marcos Gonzalez
AU - Berlin, Conny
AU - Levitan, Bennett
AU - Boeri, Marco
AU - Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G.M.
AU - Crossnohere, Norah L.
AU - Jimenez-Moreno, Cecilia
AU - Liden, Barry
AU - Stoeckert, Isabelle
AU - Veldwijk, Jorien
AU - Watt, Stephen
AU - Hauber, Brett
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Using patient preference information (PPI) to incorporate patient voices into the drug development lifecycle can help align therapies with the needs and values of patients. However, several barriers have limited the use of PPI, including a lack of clarity on its use by decision-makers, a need for greater decision-maker trust in PPI, and a lack of time, budgets, and access to specialist expertise. The value proposition for PPI could be enhanced by making it FAIR: Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. To support the development of a research agenda to deliver FAIR PPI, we reviewed related endeavors in the development of repositories of existing studies, disease models, benefit transfer, and common data standards. We concluded that developing FAIR PPI would require advances in the science of PPI, including the establishment of a consortium, mirroring the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) or Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OPOM), to develop PPI data standards, and research into the sources of variation in patient preferences. This will require the science of PPI to graduate from being a body of empirical observations to developing theories that explain variations in patient preferences, simultaneously driving both efficiency in the generation of PPI and trust in PPI.
AB - Using patient preference information (PPI) to incorporate patient voices into the drug development lifecycle can help align therapies with the needs and values of patients. However, several barriers have limited the use of PPI, including a lack of clarity on its use by decision-makers, a need for greater decision-maker trust in PPI, and a lack of time, budgets, and access to specialist expertise. The value proposition for PPI could be enhanced by making it FAIR: Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. To support the development of a research agenda to deliver FAIR PPI, we reviewed related endeavors in the development of repositories of existing studies, disease models, benefit transfer, and common data standards. We concluded that developing FAIR PPI would require advances in the science of PPI, including the establishment of a consortium, mirroring the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) or Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OPOM), to develop PPI data standards, and research into the sources of variation in patient preferences. This will require the science of PPI to graduate from being a body of empirical observations to developing theories that explain variations in patient preferences, simultaneously driving both efficiency in the generation of PPI and trust in PPI.
KW - 2025 OA procedure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217172720&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40271-025-00727-9
DO - 10.1007/s40271-025-00727-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85217172720
SN - 1178-1653
VL - 18
SP - 101
EP - 108
JO - Patient
JF - Patient
M1 - 543046
ER -